| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 01/01/1901 | | MORRISSEY, MICHAEL J. IN THE MATTER OF: | |
| 01/01/1902 | | FILED YET? | |
| 01/01/1903 | | NOTE - 01 5/28/91 ORD: SUSPENDING RESP; NOTE - 01 RESP TO SHOW CAUSE BEFORE THE NOTE - 02 BPR IN 30 DAYS WHY IDENTICAL NOTE - 02 DISC SHLD NOT BE IMPOSED; BPR NOTE - 03 TO RECOMMEND PROMPTLY THERE- NOTE - 03 AFTER TO THIS CRT WHETHER NOTE - 04 RECIPROCAL DISC SHLD BE IM- NOTE - 04 POSED OR WHETHER THE BOARD NOTE - 05 ELECTS TO PROCEED DE NOVO. NOTE - 05 NOTE - 06 8/5/91 ORD: GRANT MO OF RESP NOTE - 06 TO EXT TM TO FL RESPONSE TO NOTE - 07 THE BD'S REPORT & REC & RESP NOTE - 07 TO ADVISE THIS CRT IN 60 DAYS NOTE - 08 AS TO STATUS OF PENDG MATTER NOTE - 08 BEFORE THE VA STATE BAR. | |
| 03/29/1991 | | LETTER TRANSMITTING CERTIFIED COPY OF AN ORD OF THE VA STATE BAR. DAS PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 03/29/1991 | | DISCIPLINARY LETTER | |
| 05/28/1991 | | ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 01-05. DAS PANELRO SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 08/05/1991 | | ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 06-08. DAS PANELRBH SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 07/31/1992 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION Motion to vacate Court's temporary suspension order dated May 28, 1991, and appendices. | |
| 08/05/1992 | | PTNR MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION Bar Counsel's motion for extention to August 17, 1992, to file response to respondent's motion to vacate. | |
| 08/10/1992 | | ORDER Granting Bar Counsel's request for extension of time to August 17, 1992, to file response to respondent's motion ot vacate court's temporary suspension order. (By RO) | |
| 08/17/1992 | | PETITIONER'S OPPOSITION Memorandum of Bar Counsel in opposition to respondent's motion to vacate interim order of suspension. | |
| 08/24/1992 | | ORDER Respondent's motion to vacate Court's temporary order of suspension is denied. (By Te, Sc, Kg) | |
| 07/14/1993 | | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel stating thatthey had received a pleading styled petition for writ of mandamus and will file an answer on July 15, 1993 on behalf of the BPR. | |
| 07/15/1993 | | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. (Recommend an 18-month suspension, with a requirement that respondent prove fitness as a condition for reinstatement. | |
| 07/27/1993 | | NOTICE RECEIVED of respondent's exception to the Board's report and recommendation. | |
| 07/29/1993 | | ORDER On consideration of the exceptions of respondent filed in response to the Board on ProfessionalResponsibility's report and recommendation filed on July 15, 1993, it is ORDERED that the brief of respondent shall befiled within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of Bar Counsel shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. (NG) | |
| 07/29/1993 | | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel supporting the report and recommendation filed by the BPR. | |
| 09/07/1993 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to extend time to file response to report and recommendation. | |
| 09/07/1993 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mrmp | |
| 09/17/1993 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for an additional 3 days. | |
| 09/17/1993 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for extension of 2 days to file reply to the Board's report. | |
| 09/17/1993 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mrmp | |
| 09/17/1993 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mrxb | |
| 09/23/1993 | | RECEIVED respondent's brief( mrxb still pend) | |
| 09/27/1993 | | ORDER On consideration of the lodged brief of respondent, and it appearing that said brief was due to be filed with this court on or before September 20, 1993, it is ORDERED that respondent shall, within 10 days from the date of this order file a motion for leave to file the lodged brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in this appeal being considered only on the basis of the Board on Professional Responsibility's report and recommendation. (NG) | |
| 11/09/1993 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's lodged brief, this Court's order dated September 27, 1993, and respondent's failure to comply thereto, it is ORDERED that this appeal be considered only on the basis of the Board on Professional Responsibility's report and recommendation. PER CURIAM (FE, SU, BE) | |
| 11/09/1993 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 11/12/1993 | | RECEIVED copy of order from the United States District Court dismissing the complaint CA No. 93-0899(NHJ) Judge Norma Holloway Johnson. Before calendaring check with Wayne Witkowski, Esquire, Asst. Corporation Counsel, 727-6295, to see if case has been appealed. | |
| 11/16/1993 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mrxb | |
| 11/16/1993 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for a 3 day extension. | |
| 11/23/1993 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to vacate court's order. | |
| 12/06/1993 | | PETITIONER'S OPPOSITION to motion of respondent to vacate. | |
| 12/21/1993 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's motion for a three-day enlargement of time to accept respondent's brief, respondent's motion to vacate, and Bar Counsel's opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that respondent's motions are denied. PER CURIAM (FE, SU, BE) | |
| 05/09/1994 | | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |
| 09/09/1994 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT | |
| 09/09/1994 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mrroa | |
| 09/12/1994 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's request for oral argument and motion to reschedule on the Court's regular docket, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion for oral argument is denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's motion to reschedule on the Court's regular docket is denied as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the above entitled appeal scheduled on the summary calendar on Tuesday, September 13, 1994, at 1:30 p.m., shall be submitted without oral argument. PER CURIAM (SC, FA, RY) | |
| 09/13/1994 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 09/13/1994 | | SUBMITTED (SC,FA,RE) | |
| 10/03/1994 | | SUSPENSION Accordingly, Michael J. Morrissey is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of eighteen months form the date of this opinion, and reinstatement shall be conditioned upon proof that he is fit to practice law. D.C. Bar R. XI, Sections 3 (a) (2), 16. (SC, FA, RY) | |
| 10/07/1994 | | PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC | |
| 10/17/1994 | | RECEIVED supplement to respondent's request for rehearing en banc. | |
| 11/01/1994 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ACCEPT ATTACHMENTS TO ITS PENDING REQUEST FOR REHEARING EN BANC. | |
| 11/01/1994 | | RECEIVED RESPONDENT'S ATTACHMENTS . | |
| 11/01/1994 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 11/22/1994 | | LETTER from respondent re: publication of decision pending rehearing en banc motion. | |
| 11/22/1994 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to reinstate appeal. | |
| 11/22/1994 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mrms | |
| 11/29/1994 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL due to the existing attorney-client relation- ship in this case between Bar Counsel and the DC Board. | |
| 12/01/1994 | | RECEIVED respondent's affidavit. | |
| 12/13/1994 | | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel re: non-receipt of pleadings and request for time to respond. | |
| 12/13/1994 | | ORDER the letter of Bar Counsel of 12/9/94 construed as a motion for an extension of time w/in to file a response to respondent's motion of 12/1/94 is granted and the response of Bar Counsel shall be filed on or before 12/19/94. | |
| 12/19/1994 | | PETITIONER'S ANSWER/RESPONSE of Bar Counsel to motions of respondent for nunc pro tunc treatment of affidavit, to dismiss and to reinstate. | |
| 01/10/1995 | | ORDER The respondent has filed motions to reinstate, to dismiss, and to accept affidavit nunc pro tunc, and Bar Counsel has respondent to these motions. These motions are hereby referred to the Board on Professional Responsibility for an appropriate recommendation in light of the duration to date of respondent's interim suspension. (By SC, FA, RY) | |
| 01/24/1995 | | RESPONDENT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC | |
| 01/26/1995 | | RECEIVED respondent's supplemental statement to its pending motion for rehearing en banc in support of error by the Board, vacating of the panel's action and dismissal. | |
| 03/16/1995 | | PETITIONER'S ANSWER/RESPONSE(BPR) to Court's order dated 1/10/95 | |
| 03/28/1995 | | RECEIVED respondent's initial reply to the Board's report and recommendation. | |
| 03/31/1995 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXT TIME TO FILE respondent's initial reply to the Board's report and recommendation. | |
| 03/31/1995 | | RECEIVED respondent's amended certificate of service to initial reply to Board's report and recommendation. | |
| 03/31/1995 | | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel supporting the report and recommendation the BPR filed on 3/13/95. | |
| 04/07/1995 | | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel re: non- intent to respond to respondent's initial reply unless directed to do so by the Court. | |
| 05/10/1995 | | ORDER GRANT RESP MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file attachments to petition. (en banc) | |
| 05/10/1995 | | MISCELLANEOUS: Respondent's attachment to the petition. | |
| 05/10/1995 | | ORDER DENYING RESP PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC PER CURIAM | |
| 05/31/1995 | | ORDER GRANT RESP MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to file respondent's reply out of time and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged reply to the Board on Professional Responsibility's report and recommendation. (By SC, FA, RZ) | |
| 05/31/1995 | | RESPONDENT'S REPLY to the Board on Professional REsponsibility's report and recommendation. | |
| 05/31/1995 | | ORDER DENY RESP MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to reinstate. (By SC, FA, RZ) | |
| 05/31/1995 | | ORDER DENY RESP MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |
| 05/31/1995 | | ORDER GRANT RESP MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to accept respondent's Sec 14 (f) affidavit nunc pro tunc to May 28, 1991 is granted substantially for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. James C. McKay to the Board's recommendation. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged affidavit nunc pro tunc to May 28, 1991. (By SC, FA, RZ) | |
| 05/31/1995 | | AFFIDAVIT of respondent nunc pro tunc to May 28, 1991. | |
| 06/14/1995 | | RESPONDENT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC | |
| 08/15/1995 | | ORDER DENYING RESP PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (By WA, FE, TE, ST, SC, FA, KG, RZ, RD) | |