judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

NICQUITA L. ANDERSON V. COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SERVICES

Case Information: 08-AA-0215
Short Caption:NICQUITA L. ANDERSON V. COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SERVICESClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP109334-08Filed Date:03/14/2008

Opening Event Date:03/14/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:06/13/2008Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:09/18/2008
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerNicquita L. Anderson YPro SeN
RespondentComprehensive Health ServicesN
Carlos M. RecioNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
03/14/2008PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc)
03/14/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
03/21/2008ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to March 14, 2008. F/ORDERED that Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW)
03/21/2008CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO OAH & MILWEE
04/21/2008APPEARANCE - of Carlos M. Recio representing respondent
06/13/2008RECORD ON APPEAL
06/13/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (2/8/08 hearing)
06/13/2008RECORD COMPLETED
06/18/2008 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
07/31/2008 On consideration of this court's order of June 18, 2008, directing petitioner to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP)
08/26/2008ORDER: This appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (By: ETW)
08/26/2008DISMISSED
09/18/2008MANDATE ISSUED