judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

ANGELA SMITH V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case Information: 06-CV-0147
Short Caption:ANGELA SMITH V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB5403-03Filed Date:02/03/2006

Opening Event Date:02/03/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:04/11/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/14/2006

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantAngela Smith N
Danny C. Onorato NN
Lisa Freiman FishbergNY
Peter V. Taylor YN
AppelleeDistrict of ColumbiaN
Edward E. SchwabNY
William J. Earl NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
02/03/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/01/2006 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed on February 3, 2006, which purports to appeal BOTH the October 21, 2004, order granting the District's motion for summary judgment and the January 12, 2006, order denying the motion to reconsider, and it appearing that the motion to reconsider was not filed until November 30, 2005, which was beyond the time period for filing a D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 59 (e) motion, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be limited soley to the review of the January 12, 2006, order denying appellant's motion to reconsider. (BY: ETW) lw
03/16/2006STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (NO RT) lw
03/16/2006RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - issued 3/1/06
03/20/2006 On consideration of this court's order of March 1, 2006, directing appellant to show cause why ths appeal should not be limited soley to the review of the January 12, 2006, order denying appellant's motion to reconsider, the response thereto, and the statement regarding transcript filed by appellant, indicating that NO TRANSCRIPT IS NEEDED for this appeal, it is ORDERED that this court's March 1, 2006, order to SHOW CAUSE IS HEREBY DISCHARGED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk, of the Superior Court, of the record index in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (a)(3)(A). (BY: ETW) lw
04/11/2006RECORD INDEX
04/11/2006RECORD COMPLETED
04/12/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (BY: GP)
05/22/2006APPELLANT'S BRIEF
05/22/2006APPENDIX - aplt
06/13/2006APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to vacate briefing schedule and to refer for mediation (no oppo)
06/16/2006 On consideration of appellee's consent motion to vacate briefing schedule and to refer to mediation, and this court's December 29, 2005, M226-05 order establishing the pilot early intervention mediation program and it being the intent of only directing mediation for those selected as random, it is ORDERED that the motion to refer to mediation is denied without prejudice to the parties on their own seeking the services of the Mult-Door Dispute Resolution Center, It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to vacate briefing is granted to the extent that appellee's brief shall be filed no later than 90 days from the date of this order. (ETW) elp
08/08/2006CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED Danny Onorato, Lisa Freiman Fishberg, Peter Taylor601 Pennsyvania Ave., Nw North Building 9th Floor Washington, DC 20004 202 628-4199
09/13/2006APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 11/13/06 (no oppo) elp
09/21/2006 On consideration of appellee's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellee's brief shall be filed on or before November 13, 2006. (GP) elp
11/07/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REMAND - case to trial court (joint)
11/13/2006 On consideration of the joint motion to remand this case to trial court, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, the appeal is hereby dismissed and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings consistent with the statements made in the joint motion. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue the mandate forthwith. (ETW) elp
11/13/2006DISMISSED
11/14/2006MANDATE ISSUED