Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
01/27/2006 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
03/08/2006 | | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS and appeals nos. 05-CV-29 and 06-CV-96 are HEREBY CONSOLIDATED FOR ALL PURPOSES. It is *****MORE***** | |
03/08/2006 | | FURTHER ORDERED that in appeal no. 06-CV-96, appellant shall within 20 days from this date complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). It is *****MORE***** | |
03/08/2006 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's MOTION FOR STAY IS DENIED. Appellant has not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim that the Superior Court's permanent injuction violates the terms of the 2002 U.S. Bankruptcy Court order. Nor has appellant shown irreparable harm, an absence of, or lesser, harm to the appellee, or that a stay would be in the public interest. See Barry v. Washington Post Co., 529 A.2d 319, 321 (D.C. 1987). It is *****MORE***** | |
03/08/2006 | | FURTHER ORDERED that a consolidated briefing order shall be issued once the complete record on appeal in appeal no. 06-CV-96 has been filed with this court. (FAFIKN) | |
03/13/2006 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to file supplemental appendix (no oppo) | |
03/13/2006 | | RECEIVED - Supplemental Appendix | |
03/13/2006 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF (05CV29) | |
03/17/2006 | | On consideration of appellee's unopposed motion for leave to file the lodged supplemental appendix, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and the lodged supplemental appendix is filed in appeal no. 05-CV-29. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the statement regarding transcript in appeal No. 06-CV-96 remains due on or before March 28, 2006. (BY: GP) | |
03/17/2006 | | SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX (05CV29) | |
03/20/2006 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) - (06-CV-96) (RT-ORDERED for 7/28/05,12/15/05 & 1/5/06) elp | |
03/27/2006 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |
04/18/2006 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
04/25/2006 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
05/10/2006 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 ta | |
07/19/2006 | | LETTER - from aplt's attorney re: briefing | |
09/12/2006 | | RECORD INDEX | |
09/12/2006 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (45-pgs/armstrong 7/28/05 proc.) | |
09/12/2006 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (100-pgs/schertzer 12/15/05 proc.) | |
09/12/2006 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (63-pgs/van bremen 1/5/06 proc.) | |
09/12/2006 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
09/20/2006 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court in appeal no. 06-CV-96, and that briefing has been completed in appeal no. 05-CV-29, it is ORDERED that appellant's supplemental brief, addressing the issues raised in appeal no. 06-CV-96, and the supplemental appendix, shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's supplemental brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP) elp | |
10/30/2006 | | APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM (06CV96) | |
10/30/2006 | | APPENDIX (Supplemental) (06CV96) | |
12/01/2006 | | APLE MOTION TO EXT TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF 06cv96 no oppo 30 days | |
12/05/2006 | | On consideration of appellee's unopposed motion for an extension of time within which to file the supplemental brief, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellee's supplemental brief shall be filed on or before January 4, 2007. (GP) elp | |
12/11/2006 | | APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM 06cv96 | |
12/11/2006 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
12/26/2006 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF (Supplemental) | |
02/02/2007 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
02/02/2007 | | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of April 2007 through June 2007, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by February 19, 2007 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk | |
02/07/2007 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple | |
02/15/2007 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple | |
03/02/2007 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
04/11/2007 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
04/12/2007 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
04/12/2007 | | ARGUED before Judges Glickman, Fisher, King Charles E. Wagner, Esq. for appellant James C. McKay, Esq. for appellee | |
04/18/2007 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
04/24/2007 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
04/30/2007 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
05/09/2007 | | ORDER - On consideration of the correspondence submitted by the parties, dated April 17, 24 and 28, 2007, which correspondence purports to be submitted pursuant to D.C.App.R.28(k), it is ORDERED that the parties shall not submit, and the Clerk shall not accept for filing any further such correspondence from the parties without leave of court. (GL,FI,KG) | |
04/21/2008 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file Rule 28(K) Letter. | |
04/21/2008 | | RECEIVED Appellee's Rule 28(k) letter. | |
05/05/2008 | | On cosideration of appellee's unopposed motion to file the lodged 28(k) letter, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, the lodged 28(k) letter is filed. (GL,FI,KG) | |
05/05/2008 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
08/12/2008 | | LETTER- from aplt re: rule 28 (j) advising court tthat a petition for writ of certiorari was filed | |
04/27/2009 | | AFFIRMED MOJ (Glickman, Fisher, King) | |
05/20/2009 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
05/26/2009 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to publish the MOJ dated 4/27/09 deciding this case | |
06/01/2009 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION- to aple's motion to publish | |
06/04/2009 | | APPELLEE'S REPLY - to aplt's oppo to aple's motion to publish | |
06/24/2009 | | On consideration of appellee's motion to publish this court's memorandum opinion and judgment in the above matter filed April 27, 2009, appellant's opposition, and appellee's reply thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied. (GL,FI,KG) | |