judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

GERMAINE MIMS V. DC PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Case Information: 07-AA-0009
Short Caption:GERMAINE MIMS V. DC PUBLIC SCHOOLSClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP105349-06Filed Date:01/09/2007

Opening Event Date:01/09/2007Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:03/15/2007

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerGermaine Mims NPro SeN
RespondentDistrict of Columbia Public SchoolsN
Todd S. KimNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/09/2007PETITION FOR REVIEW **(Came in on 12/15/06 without fee or IFP & PFR was incomplete -- returned on 12/15/06)
01/09/2007FILING FEE of $100.00.
01/10/2007CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD, OAH and Michael A. Milwee, Esq. and Todd Kim, Esq.
01/17/2007 ORDERED that petitioner shall within 20 days SHOW CAUSE why this petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been untimely filed. See D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(2). (BY: ETW) lw
01/17/2007TMC - OTSC
02/13/2007 ORDERED that this PETITION for REVIEW is HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as having been untimely filed. See D.C. App. R. 15 (a); Flores v. DC Rental Housing Comm'n, 547 A.2d 1000, 103 (D.C. 1988). (BRKNTE)
02/13/2007DISMISSED
03/01/2007PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION **undated letter sent to CJ Washington & received in clerk's office on unknown date
03/01/2007TMC - appellant's motion for reconsideration
03/06/2007 ORDERED that the MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION is HEREBY DENIED. The motion does not offer a sufficient reason to excuse the untimely filing of this petition. Since all parties are generally responsible for notifying any court or agency of a change in their address, see Joyce v. Walker, 593 A.2d 199, 201-02 (d.C. 1991), and for monitoring the processing of their case, Marshall v. Marvins Credit, Inc., 122 A.2d 583 (d.C. 1956), the petitioner's difficulties in having her mail forwarded by the United States Postal Service or in obtaining new keys to a mailbox are of no moment. (BRKNTE)
03/15/2007MANDATE ISSUED
08/10/2011FiledArchived