Case Information: 07-AA-0009 | |||
Short Caption: | GERMAINE MIMS V. DC PUBLIC SCHOOLS | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | ESP105349-06 | Filed Date: | 01/09/2007 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 01/09/2007 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 03/15/2007 |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Petitioner | Germaine Mims | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
Respondent | District of Columbia Public Schools | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
01/09/2007 | PETITION FOR REVIEW **(Came in on 12/15/06 without fee or IFP & PFR was incomplete -- returned on 12/15/06) | |||
01/09/2007 | FILING FEE of $100.00. | |||
01/10/2007 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD, OAH and Michael A. Milwee, Esq. and Todd Kim, Esq. | |||
01/17/2007 | ORDERED that petitioner shall within 20 days SHOW CAUSE why this petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been untimely filed. See D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(2). (BY: ETW) lw | |||
01/17/2007 | TMC - OTSC | |||
02/13/2007 | ORDERED that this PETITION for REVIEW is HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as having been untimely filed. See D.C. App. R. 15 (a); Flores v. DC Rental Housing Comm'n, 547 A.2d 1000, 103 (D.C. 1988). (BRKNTE) | |||
02/13/2007 | DISMISSED | |||
03/01/2007 | PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION **undated letter sent to CJ Washington & received in clerk's office on unknown date | |||
03/01/2007 | TMC - appellant's motion for reconsideration | |||
03/06/2007 | ORDERED that the MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION is HEREBY DENIED. The motion does not offer a sufficient reason to excuse the untimely filing of this petition. Since all parties are generally responsible for notifying any court or agency of a change in their address, see Joyce v. Walker, 593 A.2d 199, 201-02 (d.C. 1991), and for monitoring the processing of their case, Marshall v. Marvins Credit, Inc., 122 A.2d 583 (d.C. 1956), the petitioner's difficulties in having her mail forwarded by the United States Postal Service or in obtaining new keys to a mailbox are of no moment. (BRKNTE) | |||
03/15/2007 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||
08/10/2011 | Filed | Archived |