judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

CHERITA WHITING ET AL V. MICHELLE RHEE

Case Information: 08-CV-0142
Short Caption:CHERITA WHITING ET AL V. MICHELLE RHEEClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB1150-08Filed Date:02/29/2008

Opening Event Date:02/29/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:07/23/2008Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:10/27/2008
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:06/10/2009

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantCherita Whiting NPro SeN
AppellantRobert Vinson Brannum NPro SeN
AppellantJane Zara NPro SeN
AppellantJackie Hackett-Pinckney NPro SeN
AppellantCrystala Lewis NPro SeN
AppellantMarc Borbely NPro SeN
AppellantMary Spencer NPro SeN
AppelleeMichelle Rhee N
Todd S. KimNY
James C. McKay, Jr.YY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
02/29/2008NOTICE OF APPEAL
02/29/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY- for injunction pending appeal *****************CONSTRUED AS A WRIT OF MANDAMUS *****SEE 3/11/08 ORDER LW
02/29/2008TMC - appellant's EMERGENCY motion to stay appeal - notice of supplemental declarations - addendum - opposition - reply - 2/27/08 transcript
03/03/2008MISCELLANEOUS - Addendum to emergency motion for injunction pending appeal (filed by Borbely)
03/03/2008MISCELLANEOUS - notice of supplemental declara- tions.
03/05/2008APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to aplt's motion for mandatory injunction
03/05/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (37 pgs/Tape)(2/27/08 proc.)
03/06/2008APPELLANT'S REPLY to Opposition to Emergency Motion for Injunction pending appeal
03/11/2008 On consideration of appellants' notice of appeal and motion for injunction pending appeal, CONSTRUED AS A PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS as it requests the enforcement of D.C. Code  38-917 (2) (2001)... it is ORDERED that the PWM IS HEREBY DENIED. See Banov v. Kennedy, 694 A.2d 850, 857 (D.c. 1996). It is FURTHER ORDERED that TO THE EXTENT that the MOTION SEEKS REVERSAL of the denial of injunction and dismissal of the complaint, it is CONSTRUED AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL and is HEREBY DENIED. It is *****MORE*****
03/11/2008 F/ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BRTHPR)
03/28/2008STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 2/15/08 & 2/27/08) (elp)
07/23/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#2 (16-pgs/tape 2/15/08 proc.)
07/23/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#3 (56-pgs/tape 2/15/08 proc.)
07/23/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #4 (35-pgs/tape 2/27/08 proc.)
07/23/2008RECORD COMPLETED
07/25/2008 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellants' briefs and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
08/21/2008RECORD INDEX
09/03/2008APPELLANTS' BRIEF (Borbely, Brannum, Lewis, Pinckney-Hackett, Spencer, Whiting and Zara)
09/03/2008APPENDIX
09/08/2008 On consideration of this court's order of July 25, 2008, directing appellants to file their briefs and the appendix within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that appellants Cherita Whiting, Marc Borbely, Robert Vinson Brannum, Crystala Lewis, Jackie Pinckney-Hackett, Mary Spence, and Jane Zara have filed a joint brief and the appendix with this court on September 3, 2008, and it further appearing that appellant Gina Arlotto has failed to file the brief and the appendix, it is ORDERED that appellant Gina Arlotto shall, within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief and the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure eitherto timely file to documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject appellant Gina Arlotto being dismissed as a party to this appeal. (GP) elp
09/23/2008APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to withdraw as a party to the appeal (Gina Arlotto) (Titled as: Praecipe)
09/25/2008 On consideration of appellant Gina Arlott's praecipe to withdraw her appearance as a party to this appeal, construed as a motion do dismiss her as a party to this appeal, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant Gina Arlotto is hereby dismissed as a party to this appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed with this court within 30 days from the date of this order. (ETW) elp
10/27/2008APPELLEE'S BRIEF
10/27/2008BRIEFS COMPLETED
11/21/2008APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
03/17/2009FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
03/30/2009APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
04/13/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL (All)(unopposed)
04/23/2009 ORDERED that APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED and THIS APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED. It is *****MORE*****
04/23/2009 FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS MOOT. (BY: ETW) lw
04/23/2009DISMISSED
06/10/2009MANDATE ISSUED