Case Information: 08-CV-0142 | |||
Short Caption: | CHERITA WHITING ET AL V. MICHELLE RHEE | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB1150-08 | Filed Date: | 02/29/2008 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 02/29/2008 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 07/23/2008 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | 10/27/2008 | ||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 06/10/2009 |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Appellant | Cherita Whiting | N | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Appellant | Robert Vinson Brannum | N | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Appellant | Jane Zara | N | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Appellant | Jackie Hackett-Pinckney | N | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Appellant | Crystala Lewis | N | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Appellant | Marc Borbely | N | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Appellant | Mary Spencer | N | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Appellee | Michelle Rhee | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
02/29/2008 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
02/29/2008 | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY- for injunction pending appeal *****************CONSTRUED AS A WRIT OF MANDAMUS *****SEE 3/11/08 ORDER LW | |||
02/29/2008 | TMC - appellant's EMERGENCY motion to stay appeal - notice of supplemental declarations - addendum - opposition - reply - 2/27/08 transcript | |||
03/03/2008 | MISCELLANEOUS - Addendum to emergency motion for injunction pending appeal (filed by Borbely) | |||
03/03/2008 | MISCELLANEOUS - notice of supplemental declara- tions. | |||
03/05/2008 | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to aplt's motion for mandatory injunction | |||
03/05/2008 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (37 pgs/Tape)(2/27/08 proc.) | |||
03/06/2008 | APPELLANT'S REPLY to Opposition to Emergency Motion for Injunction pending appeal | |||
03/11/2008 | On consideration of appellants' notice of appeal and motion for injunction pending appeal, CONSTRUED AS A PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS as it requests the enforcement of D.C. Code 38-917 (2) (2001)... it is ORDERED that the PWM IS HEREBY DENIED. See Banov v. Kennedy, 694 A.2d 850, 857 (D.c. 1996). It is FURTHER ORDERED that TO THE EXTENT that the MOTION SEEKS REVERSAL of the denial of injunction and dismissal of the complaint, it is CONSTRUED AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL and is HEREBY DENIED. It is *****MORE***** | |||
03/11/2008 | F/ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BRTHPR) | |||
03/28/2008 | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 2/15/08 & 2/27/08) (elp) | |||
07/23/2008 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#2 (16-pgs/tape 2/15/08 proc.) | |||
07/23/2008 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#3 (56-pgs/tape 2/15/08 proc.) | |||
07/23/2008 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #4 (35-pgs/tape 2/27/08 proc.) | |||
07/23/2008 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
07/25/2008 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellants' briefs and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp | |||
08/21/2008 | RECORD INDEX | |||
09/03/2008 | APPELLANTS' BRIEF (Borbely, Brannum, Lewis, Pinckney-Hackett, Spencer, Whiting and Zara) | |||
09/03/2008 | APPENDIX | |||
09/08/2008 | On consideration of this court's order of July 25, 2008, directing appellants to file their briefs and the appendix within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that appellants Cherita Whiting, Marc Borbely, Robert Vinson Brannum, Crystala Lewis, Jackie Pinckney-Hackett, Mary Spence, and Jane Zara have filed a joint brief and the appendix with this court on September 3, 2008, and it further appearing that appellant Gina Arlotto has failed to file the brief and the appendix, it is ORDERED that appellant Gina Arlotto shall, within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief and the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure eitherto timely file to documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject appellant Gina Arlotto being dismissed as a party to this appeal. (GP) elp | |||
09/23/2008 | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to withdraw as a party to the appeal (Gina Arlotto) (Titled as: Praecipe) | |||
09/25/2008 | On consideration of appellant Gina Arlott's praecipe to withdraw her appearance as a party to this appeal, construed as a motion do dismiss her as a party to this appeal, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant Gina Arlotto is hereby dismissed as a party to this appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed with this court within 30 days from the date of this order. (ETW) elp | |||
10/27/2008 | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |||
10/27/2008 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
11/21/2008 | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |||
03/17/2009 | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |||
03/30/2009 | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |||
04/13/2009 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL (All)(unopposed) | |||
04/23/2009 | ORDERED that APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED and THIS APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED. It is *****MORE***** | |||
04/23/2009 | FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS MOOT. (BY: ETW) lw | |||
04/23/2009 | DISMISSED | |||
06/10/2009 | MANDATE ISSUED |