| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 12/21/2005 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 01/18/2006 | | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on January 5, 2006, and it appearing that no transcript is needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (a)(3)(A). (BY: GP) | |
| 01/25/2006 | | RECORD INDEX | |
| 01/25/2006 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 01/27/2006 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellants brief and the append ix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp | |
| 02/24/2006 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |
| 02/27/2006 | | TMC - appellee's motion to dismiss - appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the brief | |
| 03/03/2006 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo to to 4/3/06 | |
| 03/14/2006 | | ORDER DENY APLE MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL It is *****MORE***** | |
| 03/14/2006 | | ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and the brief is due thirty days from the date of this order. It is *****MORE***** | |
| 03/14/2006 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellees' request for assessment of fees and damages IS DENIED. (FIKGST) | |
| 03/14/2006 | | RECEIVED - Aplt's motion for extension of time to file a response to aple's motion to dismiss | |
| 03/16/2006 | | RECEIVED - aplt's oppo to aple's motion to dismiss | |
| 04/12/2006 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
| 04/12/2006 | | APPENDIX | |
| 04/26/2006 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL (Sharek & Tiefel) | |
| 04/27/2006 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (Sharek & Tiefel) no oppo for 30 days | |
| 05/08/2006 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION - to aple's motion to dismiss | |
| 05/10/2006 | | TMC - appellant's brief - appellee's motion to dismiss - opposition - appellee's motion for extension of time to file the brief | |
| 05/16/2006 | | ORDER DENY APLE MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL W/O PREJUDICE to appellees raising the issue of whether the failure to appeal an interlocutorily appealable order bars an appeal at the conclusion of the case. It is ****MORE***** | |
| 05/16/2006 | | ORD GRANT APLE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and the brief shall be filed no later than 30 days from the date of this order. It is *****MORE***** | |
| 05/16/2006 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellees' request for assessment of fees and damages IS DENIED. (FIKGST) | |
| 06/09/2006 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION of Ronald & Rebecca Somers to substitute themselves as aples in place of aple William Tiefel pursuant to rule 43, and to allow the Somers' to file an aple's brief on 7/20/06 (dwm) | |
| 06/14/2006 | | STATEMENT of consent by Aple Sharek to co-appellee's motions for substitution and for extension of time to file their brief. (dwm) | |
| 06/14/2006 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo (Sharek)dwm to 7/20/06 | |
| 06/22/2006 | | On consideration of the motion of Ronald and Rebecca Somers to substitute themselves as appellees in place of appellee William Tiefel and to allow the Somers to file a brief on July 20, 2006, and it appearing that the Somers have purchased the property that is the subject of this appeal from William Tiefel, and the consent motion of appellee Carl R. Sharek for extension of time, it is ORDERED that the motion of Ronald and RebeccaSomers to substitute is granted and they shall be substituted in place of appellee William Tiefel. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of appellees Ronald and Rebecca Somers for an extension of time to file the brief is granted and the brief shall be filed on or before July 20, 2006. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of appellee Carl Sharek is granted and the brief shall be filed on or before July 20, 2006. (ETW) elp | |
| 07/20/2006 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF (Sharek & Somers) modified 8/14/06 elp | |
| 08/03/2006 | | It appearing that the brief of appellants and the appendix was filed with this court on June 12, 2006, and it further appearing that the brief of appellees Ronald and Rebecca Somers was due to be filed on or before July 20, 2006, (See D.C. App. R. 31), but have not been filed, it is ORDERED that appellees Ronald and Rebecca Somers shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit their brief, or a statement that the party will not be filing a brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief, or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to being scheduled for consideration on the record and on the appellate briefs on file. (GP) elp | |
| 08/10/2006 | | APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE - Ronald & Rebecca Somers to the court's order dated 8/3/06 | |
| 08/14/2006 | | On consideration of this court's order of August 3, 2006, directing appellees Ronald and Rebecca Somers to file their brief, and the response thereto, and it appearing that appellees Ronald and Rebecca Somers and Carl R. Sharek have file a joint brief with this court on July 20, 2006, it is ORDERED that this court's order of August 3, 2006, is hereby vacated. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal shall be schedule for consideration before a merits division of this court as soon as the calendar permits. (ETW) elp | |
| 08/14/2006 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 08/31/2006 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
| 11/21/2006 | | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of February 2007 through March 2007, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by December 11, 2006, of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk | |
| 12/04/2006 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING (Appellant's) | |
| 12/07/2006 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING (Atty B. Adams) | |
| 12/11/2006 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple | |
| 02/02/2007 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
| 03/26/2007 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 03/26/2007 | | ARGUED before Judges Farrell, Kramer, Thompson Harvy J. Volzer, Esq. for appellants Raighne C. Delaney, Esq. for appellees Somers Brigitte L. Adams, Esq. for appellee Sharek | |
| 03/27/2007 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
| 05/17/2007 | | AFFIRMED IN PART/REVERSED IN PART Opinon (Farrell, Kramer, Thompson) and Judgment affirming in part and reversing in part the trial court's decision and remanding the case with instructions, as set forth in said opinion. | |
| 06/11/2007 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |