judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

TOMOYUKI TAKAHASHI V. DC DEP'T OF HUMAN SERVICES

Case Information: 06-AA-1382
Short Caption:TOMOYUKI TAKAHASHI V. DC DEP'T OF HUMAN SERVICESClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - OAH - Human Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:HSP101115-06Filed Date:11/24/2006

Opening Event Date:11/24/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:03/29/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:06/26/2007
Argued/Submitted:03/20/2008
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:06/16/2008

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerTomoyuki Takahashi N
RespondentD.C. Department of Human ServicesN
Richard S. LoveYY
Todd S. KimNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/24/2006PETITION FOR REVIEW
11/24/2006FILING FEE of $100.00.
11/27/2006CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Todd Kim, Esq.
12/01/2006 On consideration of the petition for review, it is ORDERED that the Office of the Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). (GP)
03/29/2007RECORD ON APPEAL (Including transcript)
03/29/2007RECORD COMPLETED
04/03/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
05/09/2007PETITIONER'S BRIEF
05/09/2007APPENDIX - petitioner I & II
06/15/2007RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF (no oppo) (Titled: Respondent's Consent Motion to Extend)
06/15/2007RECEIVED - respondent's brief
06/26/2007 On consideration of respondent's motion for leave to late file the lodged brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and the lodged brief is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (GP)
06/26/2007RESPONDENT'S BRIEF
06/26/2007BRIEFS COMPLETED
07/06/2007FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
07/10/2007PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF
10/19/2007 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of January 2008 thru March 2008, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by November 21, 2007 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
11/20/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
02/01/2008CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
03/20/2008FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
03/20/2008ARGUED before Judges Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby, Kern Joseph R. Cooney, Esq. for Petitioner Richard S. Love, Esq. for Respondent
05/22/2008AFFIRMED Opinion (Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby, Kern) and Judgment affirming the decision on review.
06/16/2008MANDATE ISSUED