Case Information: 06-AA-1382 | |||
Short Caption: | TOMOYUKI TAKAHASHI V. DC DEP'T OF HUMAN SERVICES | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - OAH - Human Services |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | HSP101115-06 | Filed Date: | 11/24/2006 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 11/24/2006 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 03/29/2007 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | 06/26/2007 | ||
Argued/Submitted: | 03/20/2008 | ||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 06/16/2008 |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Petitioner | Tomoyuki Takahashi | N | ||||||||||
Respondent | D.C. Department of Human Services | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
11/24/2006 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
11/24/2006 | FILING FEE of $100.00. | |||
11/27/2006 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Todd Kim, Esq. | |||
12/01/2006 | On consideration of the petition for review, it is ORDERED that the Office of the Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). (GP) | |||
03/29/2007 | RECORD ON APPEAL (Including transcript) | |||
03/29/2007 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
04/03/2007 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP) | |||
05/09/2007 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF | |||
05/09/2007 | APPENDIX - petitioner I & II | |||
06/15/2007 | RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF (no oppo) (Titled: Respondent's Consent Motion to Extend) | |||
06/15/2007 | RECEIVED - respondent's brief | |||
06/26/2007 | On consideration of respondent's motion for leave to late file the lodged brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and the lodged brief is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (GP) | |||
06/26/2007 | RESPONDENT'S BRIEF | |||
06/26/2007 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
07/06/2007 | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |||
07/10/2007 | PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF | |||
10/19/2007 | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of January 2008 thru March 2008, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by November 21, 2007 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk | |||
11/20/2007 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |||
02/01/2008 | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |||
03/20/2008 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
03/20/2008 | ARGUED before Judges Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby, Kern Joseph R. Cooney, Esq. for Petitioner Richard S. Love, Esq. for Respondent | |||
05/22/2008 | AFFIRMED Opinion (Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby, Kern) and Judgment affirming the decision on review. | |||
06/16/2008 | MANDATE ISSUED |