judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JAMALL OUTERBRIDGE V. TAMARA THOMAS

Case Information: 06-FM-1376
Short Caption:JAMALL OUTERBRIDGE V. TAMARA THOMASClassification:Appeals - Family - Domestic Relations
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:DRB2129-06Filed Date:10/18/2006

Opening Event Date:10/18/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:10/09/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:01/22/2008
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantJamall Outerbridge YPro SeN
AppelleeTamara Thomas N
Alana M. Hecht NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
10/18/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
12/04/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY
12/05/2006TMC - appellant's EMERGENCY motion to stay - opposition
12/07/2006APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to aplt's emergency motion for stay pending appeal
12/08/2006ORDER DENYING APPELLANT MOTION FOR STAY AS MOOT. It is *****MORE*****
12/08/2006 F/ORDERED that appellant shall within 10 days from the date of this order file with the Appeals Coordinator's Office a request for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court, on motion with notice, to the appropriate motions or trial judge, for determination in accordance with Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984). See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously submit a file stamped copy of that motion with this court, it is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (FABRNE) *J. Blackburne-Rigsby notes that this court considered the motion on the merits and also concluded that appellant did not meet the standard to prevail on a motion to stay.
12/21/2006RECEIVED - a filed stamped copy of motion for appeal transcript filed in ACO 10/10/06 - Tape (rt. ordered) - dlm
01/23/2007COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS Granted
01/30/2007 On consideration of the motion of counsel for appellee to withdraw his appearance as counsel of record, it is ORDERED that the motion of counsel for appellee is granted and the appearance of Jason M. Knott, Esq. is hereby withdrawn as counsel of record. It is F/O that the Clerk shall note that Alana M. Hecht, Esq. shall remain as the new counsel of record. (ETW)
10/09/2007RECORD COPIES
10/09/2007RECORD INDEX
10/09/2007SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (62 pgs/tape) 10/10/06 proc.
10/09/2007RECORD COMPLETED
10/16/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP)
11/29/2007 On consideration of this court's order of OCTOBER 16,2007, directing appellant to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days and it appearing that the brief and the limited appendix have not been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellant and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP)
12/28/2007ORDER: This appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (By: ETW)
12/28/2007DISMISSED
01/22/2008MANDATE ISSUED