judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

GILLIS VS. CASTRO

Case Information: 39685
Short Caption:GILLIS VS. CASTROCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Douglas Co. - Ninth Judicial District - 98DI0547Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Child Custody/Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:06/11/2002How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
05/29/2002Filing Fee Filing Fee due. 08/02/02--Order filed in district court 7/31/02 granting appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
05/29/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 02-09350
05/29/2002Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
05/31/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn2[NRAP 11(a)(2) (the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings).] fn3[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 02-09512
06/11/2002Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Copy. 02-10133
06/11/2002Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
07/16/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Appellant's June 19, 2002, motion to this court is improper at this time, and so we deny it without prejudice. We note that as this appeal involves child custody, it should be expedited. Accordingly, appellant shall have ten days within which to submit his motion to the district court. The district court shall have twenty days within which to rule upon the motion and transmit its order to this court. Fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from him.] 02-12204
08/02/2002Order/IncomingFiled District Court Order. Copy of order filed in district court on July 31, 2002, granting appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 02-13245
08/21/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn4[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant.] SNP02-CY/DA/ML 02-14247
10/14/2002Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." Fn1 Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered appellant's petition.] SNP02-CY/DA/ML. 02-17687
11/08/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 02-17752
11/08/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
12/23/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on November 12, 2002. 02-17752