Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
10/07/1996 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL (pro-se) | |
11/21/1996 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Kenneth H. Rosenau, Esq. | |
11/21/1996 | | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING previously consolidated appeals nos. 94-CF-981 and 94-CF-1059 with appeal no. 96-CO-1437 for all purposes herein. >Kenneth H. Rosenau, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant in appeal no. 96-CO-1437 herein. Counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement in appeal no. 96-CO-1437. SS, that the stay enterd by this court on June 21, 1996, in appeal no. 94-CF-981, is hereby vacated. (By: AMW) | |
11/21/1996 | | error | |
12/13/1996 | | JUDGMENT GRANT COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ANDERS)in no. 94-CF-1059 to the extent that the appointment of Joseph H. Green, Jr., Esquire is hereby vacated and Alan L. Balaran, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant herein. Joseph H. Green, Jr., Esquire, shall transmit all documents pertaining to this appeal to newly appointed counsel forthwith. F/O that the brief of appellant Guzman in no. 94-CF-1059, shall be filed within 60 days from the date of this order. (by: RZRDGA) | |
01/07/1997 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant in appeal no. 96-CO-1437 shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the docketing statement out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the docketing statement or to request an extension of time within which to do so so. Failure to comply witounsel's appointment being vacated. FO that the Clerk of Superior Court shall prepare and transmit the complete record on appeal in appeal no. 96-CO-1437 to this court forthwith. (By: GP) | |
01/13/1997 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for voucher for transalator or alternative relief | |
01/13/1997 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS | |
01/13/1997 | | RECEIVED - ADS (96-CO-1437) | |
01/14/1997 | | RECORD ON APPEAL for 96 CO 1437 | |
01/14/1997 | | RECORD COMPLETED (1437) | |
02/07/1997 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 30 days for William Guzman in 94 CF 1059 (consent) | |
03/03/1997 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION withdrawal of motion re voucher or electronic disk | |
03/11/1997 | | APPELLANT'S SECOND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 14 days for William Guzman in 94 CF 1059 | |
03/26/1997 | | RECEIVED - aplt's brief | |
03/28/1997 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to withdraw the motions of Louis Bolanos for voucher for translator, and the motion for voucher for translator is hereby withdrawn,. (More) | |
03/28/1997 | | ORDER GRANTING APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS in appeal no. 96-CO-1437, and the Clerk shall file the lodged docketing statement in appeal no. 96-CO-1437. (More) | |
03/28/1997 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT in appeal no. 96-CO-1437. | |
03/28/1997 | | ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF(multiple motions) of W. Guzman to the extent that the Clerk shall file the lodged brief of appellant W. Guzman. FO that appellant Louis Bolanos shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, file a supplemental brief or a statement that a supplemental brief will not be filed. (By: AMW) | |
03/28/1997 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF of W. Guzman | |
03/28/1997 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 -supplementation to brief (Bolanos) | |
04/30/1997 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
04/30/1997 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
05/09/1997 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF (Bolanos) | |
07/07/1997 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
07/08/1997 | | LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
07/18/1997 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
10/09/1997 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
10/09/1997 | | ARGUED (SC,RD,RU) Kenneth H. Rosenau, Esquire, for appellant. Alan Balaran, Esquire, for appellant. Adam L. Rosman, Esquire, for appellee. | |
09/24/1998 | | error | |
10/02/1998 | | ORDER that Louis Bolanos shall w/in 15 days from the date of this order show cause if any ther be, why this appeal should not be dismissed. (SC,RU,RD) | |
10/27/1998 | | ORDER: On consideration of this court's order of 10/2/98 directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed and it appearing that appeallant has failed to respond, it is ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed. (SC/RZ/RD) | |
10/27/1998 | | DISMISSED | |
11/18/1998 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
09/08/1999 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION for an extension delay to file appeal in this court against the decision to affirmed my appeal the D.C. Superior Court of Appeal | |
09/23/1999 | | ORDER (SC,RU,RD) appellant's moiton to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. FO appellant's motion for ext. of time is denied w/out prejudice to appellant's filing a D.C. Code 23-110 motion in the trial court. | |
11/03/1999 | | MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE in 94CF1059 (Guzman) | Denied |
11/08/1999 | | ORDER (SC,RU,RD) Appellee is directed to file a response to appellants motion to recall the mandate within 30 days. | |
12/08/1999 | | APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE- to aplt's motion to recall mandate | |
12/21/1999 | | TMC - Aplt's motion to recall the mandate - Aple's opposition | |
03/16/2000 | | ORDERED that appellant's motion to recall the mandate in no. 94-CF-1059 is hereby held in abeyance pending further order of the court. F/O that Henry A. Escoto, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. F/O that counsel for appellant shall, within 40 days from the date of this order, file a supplement to appellant's pro se motion to recall the mandate. Counsel for appellee shall file a response to the supplement within 30 days thereafter. (by: SCRZRD) | |
03/16/2000 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Henry A. Escoto, Esquire | |
04/12/2000 | | LETTER from aplt stating that he has been unable to get in contact with apptd counsel | |
04/26/2000 | | APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSEto file supplement to aplt's pro-se motion to recall mandate no oppo 90 days (Guzman) | |
05/04/2000 | | LETTER referring to counsel for appellant the April 26 pro se letter from appellant (JAC) | |
10/26/2000 | | ORD DENYING MOTION TO RECALL MANDATEin co-appellant Guzman's case that has been severed | |