judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

KNOX VS. TOMAC ENTERPRISES

Case Information: 40272
Short Caption:KNOX VS. TOMAC ENTERPRISESCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV0004857Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:02/28/2003How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
09/26/2002Filing Fee Filing Fee due. See 01/22/03 docket entry. (Filing fee waived-In forma pauperis.)
09/26/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 02-16691
09/26/2002Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
10/18/2002Filing Fee Returned Filing Fee. Money Order No. 87685006410 returned to Roger Thomas Knox in the amount of $2.00. The required filing fee is $200.00.
12/27/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Order Directing Compliance with NRAP 24(A). Appellant shall have thirty days from the date of this order within which to file in the district court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and provide a file-stamped copy of the motion to this court. We caution appellant that failure either to properly seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court or to pay the filing fee may result in the dismissal of this appeal. fn1[ Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from him on October 16, November 26, and December 18, 2002.] 02-22130
01/22/2003Order/IncomingFiled District Court Order. Certified copy of Order to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed in district court on 1/13/03. 03-01152
02/06/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn2[See NRAP 11(a)(2) (the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings). fn3[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 03-02177
02/28/2003Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. Deficiency Notice: the following item is not included in the original record--9/24/02 Motion for Trial Transcripts at Public Expense. (Placed in the Record as the first document). 03-03316
02/28/2003Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
07/06/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Directing Response. This is a proper person appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment. fn1[We direct the clerk of this court to conform the caption on this court's docket to the caption on this order.] Respondents shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to file a response, including authorities, as to why the summary judgment order should not be reversed. 04-12238
08/05/2004MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. (Mike Parman). 04-14228
08/05/2004AppendixFiled Appendix. Appendix to Response to Order to Show Cause (Mike Parman). 04-14229
08/05/2004MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. (Fiedelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriter's, Inc.) 04-14234
08/05/2004AppendixFiled Appendix. Appendix to Response to Order to Show Cause (Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.). 04-14235
08/06/2004MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. (Tomac Enterprises). 04-14258
08/31/2004Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. --Affidavit of Mailing. 04-15870
12/21/2004Order/DispositionalFiled Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order of Reversal and Remand. "We reverse the summary judgment and remand this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order." NNP04-NB/DA/MG 04-23266
01/11/2005Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $150 from Gordon R. Muir, Ltd.--check no. 3244.
01/11/2005Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Rehearing. Tomac Enterprises' and Gerry P. Tomac's Petition for Rehearing. 05-00559
02/10/2005Other Returned Unfiled Document. Original document entitled, "Response to Tomac's Request for Rehearing." 05-02752
02/22/2005Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NRAP 40(c). Fn1[We direct the court clerk to correct our order of reversal and remand, filed on December 21, 2004, to read at page 6, lines 16-17, "Additionally, Tomac introduced uncontroverted evidence that it did not actually or proximately cause the fire or the loss of the premises." NNP04-NB/MG 05-03515
03/22/2005RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal this day. 05-04535
03/22/2005Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
04/01/2005RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by District Court Clerk on March 23, 2005. 05-04535