judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

OPFER (RAY) VS. WARDEN

Case Information: 33855
Short Caption:OPFER (RAY) VS. WARDENCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR95P2542Classification:Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:08/19/1999How Submitted:On Briefs

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
03/05/1999Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
03/05/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 99-01583
03/10/1999TranscriptFiled Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. January 25, 1999 Proceedings: Court Reporter: Christian Knox. 99-01685
03/11/1999Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. (Mailed on: Fed-Ex 3/10/99). 99-01731
03/11/1999Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: January 22, 1999. To Court Reporter: Isolde Zihn. (Mailed on: Fed-Ex 3/10/99). 99-01732
03/30/1999TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: 1/22/99. Court Reporter: Isolde Zihn. 99-02347
07/02/1999BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: Fed-Ex 7/1/99. 99-05818
07/02/1999AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. 99-05819
07/27/1999BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: 7/26/99. 99-06806
08/19/1999BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 8/19/99. 99-07769
08/19/1999Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
11/29/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order of Affirmance in Part, Reversing in Part, and Remanding in Part. " . . . we reverse that portion of the district court's order dismissing appellant's claim challenging restitution, we vacate that portion of appellant's judgment of conviction requiring him to pay restitution for indefinite future counseling costs, and we remand this matter to the district court for the limited purpose of resentencing to set a definite dollar amount of restitution for those costs . . . we affirm the order of the district court in all other respects." SNP00A-RR/CY/NB 00-20852
12/27/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 00-21001
12/27/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
01/11/2001RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 28, 2000. 00-21001