judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

IN RE: JAMES H. GILBERT

Case Information: 86-BG-1614
Short Caption:IN RE: JAMES H. GILBERTClassification:Bar Governance - Bar - Disciplinary
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:Filed Date:12/05/1986

Opening Event Date:12/05/1986Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:09/28/1987Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:09/28/1987
Argued/Submitted:12/01/1987
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerBar CounselN
Leonard H. Becker NN
Thomas E. Flynn NN
PetitionerBoard on Professional ResponsibilityN
Charles R. Donnenfeld NN
Mark W. FosterNY
RespondentJames H. Gilbert NPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/01/1901GILBERT, JAMES H. IN THE MATTER OF:
01/01/1903NOTE - 01 060987 ORDER: PURSUANT TO RULE NOTE - 01 XI, sec.18(3) OF THE RULES GOV NOTE - 02 THE BAR OF D.C. THAT RESPONDNT NOTE - 02 SHOW CAUSE BY 6/9/87 WHY THE NOTE - 03 RECOMMENDED DISCIPLINE SHOULD NOTE - 03 NOT BE IMPOSED. RESPONDENT, IN NOTE - 04 DOING, MUST DEMONSTRATE UPON NOTE - 04 THE FACE OF THE RECORD UPON NOTE - 05 WHICH THE DISCIPLINE IS PRE- NOTE - 05 DICATED THAT (a) The procedure NOTE - 06 elswhere was so lacking in NOTE - 06 notice or opportunity to be NOTE - 07 heard as to constitute a NOTE - 07 deprivation of due process; or NOTE - 08 (b)There was such infirmity of NOTE - 08 proof establishing the miscon- NOTE - 09 duct as to give rise to the NOTE - 09 clear conviction that the NOTE - 10 Court could not, consistent NOTE - 10 w/its duty, accept as final NOTE - 11 the conclusion on that subject NOTE - 11 or (c) The impostion of the NOTE - 12 same discipline by the Court NOTE - 12 would result in grave NOTE - 13 injustice; or (d) The miscon- NOTE - 13 duct established warrants NOTE - 14 substantially different NOTE - 14 discipline in this jurisdictn; NOTE - 15 or (e) The misconduct else- NOTE - 15 where does not constitute NOTE - 16 misconduct in D.C. FO: THAT NOTE - 16 THE CLK IS DIR TO CAUSE A NOTE - 17 COPY OF RULE XI, sec. 18(3) TO NOTE - 17 BE TRANSMITTED TO RESPONDENT. NOTE - 18 080687 ORDER: CLK TO ENTER NOTE - 18 APPEARANCE OF R. HALE FOOTE, NOTE - 19 ESQ., AS COUNSEL FOR RESPONDNT NOTE - 19 FO: GRANT MO FOR EXT TO FILE NOTE - 20 RESPONSE TO 6/9/87 ORDER; NOTE - 20 RESPONSE DUE BY 8/28/87-NFX.
01/01/1905TRDATE- 87/12/01 ACTION - ARG ATTY 1 - EPSTEIND FOR - RESPONDENT ATTY 2 - FLANAGANF FOR - PETITIONER
12/05/1986FiledOPENING EVENT - Opening Event
12/05/1986NOTICE OF DISBARMENT OF THE CRT OF APPEALS OF MD. PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
12/17/1986ORDER BPR IN 30 DAYS TO RECOMMEND WHETHER RECIPROCAL DISP SHOULD BE IMPOSED. PANELPY SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
04/29/1987REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
06/09/1987ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 01 - 17. EBP PANELPY SCDATE 051987 SCHPRD READY
07/01/1987RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO 6/9/87 OTSC TO AUGUST 10, 1987. (NO OPPO) (NFX.) EBP PANEL SCDATE 070987 SCHPRD RPR
08/03/1987RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO OTSC TO AUGUST 28, 1987. EBP PANEL SCDATE 081087 SCHPRD RPR
08/03/1987NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF R. HALE FOOTE ESQ., & DAVID EPSTEIN, ESQ., AS COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT.EBP PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
08/06/1987ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 17 - 20. EBP PANELPY SCDATE 082787 SCHPRD OPP
08/28/1987RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE TO 6/9/87 OTSC. EBP PANEL SCDATE 082887 SCHPRD RPR
09/14/1987PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME BAR COUNSEL'S MO FOR LV TO FILE OPPO TO RESPONDENT'S RE- SPONSE & FOR EXT TO 9/28. EBP PANEL SCDATE 091087 SCHPRD CHECK
09/24/1987ORDER GRANT BC'S MO FOR LV TO FILE OPPO, DUE 9/28, RESPONDNT MAY FILE RESP THERETO BY 10/19/87. PANELPY SCDATE 092587 SCHPRD CHECK
09/28/1987FiledRecord Completed
09/28/1987FiledBriefing Completed
09/28/1987RESPONDENT'S BRIEF (NO BRIEF -- ADS ONLY) PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
09/28/1987PETITIONER'S ANSWER/RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER EBP PANEL SCDATE 092887 SCHPRD OPP
12/01/1987FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
12/01/1987ARGUED PANELPYNWBE SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
03/07/1988DISBARMENT OPINION DIBARRING RESPONDENT - EFFECTIVE IN 30 DAYS. EBP PANELPYNWBE SCDATE 120187 SCHPRD RDEC
03/07/1988DISP NO - 01 DISP - DBAR METH -OPN JUDGE -PC CITE 538 A.2d 742
03/07/1988OPINION TYPE M JUDGE - PC PAGE # - 0413
06/30/1988NOTICE OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARIFILED IN U.S. SUPREME COURT ON 6/6/88 #87-2116; DENIED ON 10/3/88 RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD