Case Information: 05-CO-1585 | |||
Short Caption: | DARRYL PAYNE-BEY V. UNITED STATES | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal Other - Other Criminal |
Lead: | 05-CO-1584 | Consolidated: | 05-CO-1585 |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | FEL7381-89 | Filed Date: | 09/09/2005 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 09/09/2005 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 12/06/2006 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 07/23/2007 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Appellant | Darryl Payne-Bey | Y | Pro Se | N | |||||
Appellee | United States | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
09/09/2005 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
11/16/2006 | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS nos. 05-CO-1584 and 05-CO-1585 for all purposes It is FURTHER ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record indexes and record copies in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (By: GP) | |||
12/06/2006 | RECORD COPIES in 06-CO-1585. | |||
12/06/2006 | RECORD INDEX in 06-CO-1585. | |||
12/06/2006 | RECORD COPIES (05-CO-1584) | |||
12/06/2006 | RECORD INDEX (05-CO-1584) | |||
12/06/2006 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
03/08/2007 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) | |||
03/23/2007 | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FILED AS: affidavit of indigent appellant in support of motion for appointment of counsel LW | |||
04/03/2007 | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for an Order to be assigned to a Halfway House or Home Monitor to assist in Appellant's legal Defense. | |||
04/03/2007 | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |||
04/20/2007 | ORDER DENYING APLT MO FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motion to be assigned to a halfway house or home monitor is denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that apepllant shall within 15 days from the date of this order file the limited appendix. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days from the date the limited appendix is filed with this court. (By: ETW) | |||
04/24/2007 | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for an extension of time to file Appendix to Brief. (Served By: DCCA) | |||
05/01/2007 | RECEIVED Appendix to Appellant's Brief. | |||
05/11/2007 | On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the limited appendix, and the lodged limited appendix, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the lodged limited appendix is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (By: GP) | |||
05/11/2007 | APPENDIX - limited | |||
06/11/2007 | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE | |||
06/12/2007 | TMC - motion for summary affirmance - appellant's brief | |||
06/28/2007 | ORDERED that appellee's MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE is GRANTED. See Oliver T. Carr Mgm't, Inc. v. Nat'l Delicatessen, Inc., 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C. 1979). The trial court did not err in concluding that appelalnt's motions were barred by the abuse of writ doctrine. See McClesky v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467 (1991); Thomas v. US, 772 A.2d 8188 (D.C. 2001). ACCORDINGLY, it is *****MORE***** | |||
06/28/2007 | FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order on appeal BE and HEREBY is AFFIRMED. (RDGLTE) | |||
07/23/2007 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||
08/24/2007 | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to dismiss the motion for affimance (construed as a motion for reconsideration) | |||
09/06/2007 | ORDER DENY APPELLANT MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION See Bradley v. U.S, 881 A.2d 640, 645 (D.C. 2005). (RD,GL,TE) |