IN RE: RENE DORRAINE ATWATER, APLT

Case Information: 06-PR-1146
Short Caption:	IN RE: RENE DORRAINE ATWATER, APLT	Classification:	Appeals - Probate - Probate
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:	INT176-06	Filed Date:	09/29/2006
Opening Event Date:	09/29/2006	Case Status:	Closed
Record Completed:	02/22/2007	Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:		Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:	08/30/2007
		Costs Waived

Events
Event Date	Status	Description	Result
09/29/2006		NOTICE OF APPEAL
10/17/2006		On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on September 29, 2006, and it appearing that appellant was granted in forma pauperis status in the trial court, and it further appearing that transcript may be needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order file with the Appeals Coordinator's Office a request for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court, on motion with notice, to the appropriate motions or trial judge, for determination in accordance with Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984). See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously submit a file stamped copy of that motion with this court, it is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) elp
11/22/2006		RECEIVED - courtesy copy of motion for appeal transcript filed in superior court (RT-NEEDED/RT-REQUESTED for 8/17/06) elp
02/22/2007		RECORD INDEX
02/22/2007		RECORD COPIES
02/22/2007		SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (19pgs/Tape) 8/17/06 proc.
02/22/2007		RECORD COMPLETED
03/01/2007		It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' briefs shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
04/04/2007		APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 5/10/07.
04/19/2007		On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before May 10, 2007. (GP) elp
05/07/2007		APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until June 5, 2007
05/23/2007		On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and the limited appendix to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before June 5, 2007. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (GP) elp
06/04/2007		APPELLANT'S BRIEF
06/04/2007		APPENDIX- aplt
07/09/2007		APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo D.C. to 8/8/07
07/13/2007		On consideration of appellee the District of Columbia's unopposed motiion for an extension of time to file the brief, and it further appearing that the brief of the appellant and the appendix were filed with this court on June 4, 2007, and the brief of appellee Warren Gorman was due to be filed on or before July 9, 2007, and has not been filed, it is ORDERED that appellee the District of Columbia's motion is granted and appellee the District of Columbia's brief shall be filed on or before August 8, 2007. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee Warren Gorman shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, submit the brief, accompanied by motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request and extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to being scheduled for consideration on the record and on the appellate briefs on file. (GP) elp
07/18/2007		APPELLEE'S MOTION TO REMAND
07/19/2007		TMC - appellee's motion to remand - response - appellant's motion for appointment of counsel - response
07/19/2007		APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
07/24/2007		APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE- to aplt's motion for appointment of counsel
07/27/2007		APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to aple's mot to remand. (forward from ACO 8/1/07, response was left in their night drop)
08/06/2007		APPELLEE'S REPLY - to aplt's opposition to motion of aple to remand (D.C.)
08/07/2007		ORDERED that appellee's MOTION TO REMAND is GRANTED and this case is HEREBY REMANDED to the Superior Court with instructions that it make findings as to whether Ms. Atwater possesses the ability to express her desires concerning health care to such an extent that a conflict could arise between her desires and her needs. It is *****MORE*****
08/07/2007		FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL is DENIED. (FABRNE)
08/07/2007		REMANDED
08/30/2007		MANDATE ISSUED
09/30/2013	Filed	Archived