| Case Information: 10-CF-0899 | |||
| Short Caption: | ERNEST M. GREELY, JR. V. UNITED STATES | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal Felony - Drug Related |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CF2-3379-10 | Filed Date: | 06/28/2010 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 06/28/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 12/02/2010 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 06/02/2011 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | ||||||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
| Appellant | Ernest M. Greely, Jr. | Y |
| |||||||||
| Appellee | United States | N |
| |||||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 06/28/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 08/04/2010 | On consideration of the notice of appeal and it appearing that appellant has been found eligible for court appointed counsel, it is ORDERED that William T. Morrison, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall immediately take the necessary steps to review the trial court record and to ensure that the transcripts necessary to the appeal have been ordered and shall, within 30 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the statement regarding transcript available for completion online. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting and Recording Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. (JAC) | |||
| 08/04/2010 | APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) William T. Morrison, Esquire | |||
| 09/22/2010 | On consideration of this court's order of August 4, 2010, directing counsel for appellant to file the statement regarding transcript within 30 days and it appearing that the statement regarding transcript has not been filed, it is ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the statement regarding transcript, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the document or to request an extension of time within which to do so. (Castillo) | |||
| 09/30/2010 | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT RE TRANSCRIPT no oppo | |||
| 09/30/2010 | RECEIVED - aplt's statement regarding transcipts and motion for appeal transcript | |||
| 10/08/2010 | On consideration of appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged statement regarding transcript, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the lodged statement regarding transcript is filed. (JAC) | |||
| 10/08/2010 | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT ordered/needed) | |||
| 12/02/2010 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (11pgs/Tape) 4/14/10 proc. | |||
| 12/02/2010 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #2 (9pgs/Tape) 6/22/10 proc. w/CD | |||
| 12/02/2010 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 12/09/2010 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (Castillo) | |||
| 12/09/2010 | RECORD INDEX | |||
| 12/09/2010 | RECORD COPIES | |||
| 12/28/2010 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 2/17/11 NO OPPO | |||
| 01/04/2011 | On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before February 17, 2011. (JAC) | |||
| 02/23/2011 | COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ANDERS) | Granted | ||
| 03/02/2011 | ORDERED that APPELLANT SHALL NO LATER THAN MARCH 24, 2011 file any response showing, with specificity any reason why counsel's motion should not be granted and the conviction, order or judgment on appeal affirmed... FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTION OF COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW IS HEREBY HELD IN ABEYANCE pending appelant's response to this order. (BY: ETW) LW | |||
| 03/02/2011 | TMC - motion to withdraw (ANDERS) | |||
| 05/10/2011 | ORDERED that the MOTION TO WITHDRAW IS GRANTED. See Anders v. California... It is ****MORE***** | |||
| 05/10/2011 | FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment on appeal is AFFIRMED. (FITEST) | |||
| 06/02/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||