| Case Information: 32075 | |||
| Short Caption: | SARMIENTO (LUIS) VS. STATE | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Mineral Co. - Eleventh Judicial District - 1624 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction/Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 06/23/1998 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 04/01/1998 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 04/01/1998 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 00-09826 | |
| 04/17/1998 | Motion | Received Proper Person Motion. Leave to Proceed in Proper Person. | ||
| 04/17/1998 | Brief | Received Proper Person Brief. Appellant's Opening Brief. | ||
| 04/29/1998 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due: 120 days. fn1--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] | ||
| 06/23/1998 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal Copy. | ||
| 06/23/1998 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 02/02/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. We conclude that appellant is not entitled to relief and that briefing and oral argument are unwarranted. " . . . we affirm the order of the district court." fn1[We have considered all proper person documents filed or received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] SNP00A-1-CY/RR/NB | 01-02182 | |
| 02/28/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 01-02394 | |
| 02/28/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 03/08/2001 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on March 1, 2001. | 01-02394 | |