judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

TIMOTHY A. JONES V. HOWARD UNIVERSITY

Case Information: 89-CV-1155
Short Caption:TIMOTHY A. JONES V. HOWARD UNIVERSITYClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CA08127-89Filed Date:10/05/1989

Opening Event Date:10/05/1989Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:12/01/1992Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:02/19/1993
Argued/Submitted:06/15/1993
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:10/13/1993

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantTimothy A. Jones N
William S. StancilYY
AppelleeHoward UniversityN
Susan L. Riley YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/01/1901JONES, TIMOTHY A. HOWARD UNIVERSITY
01/01/1902NO R EVER FILED
01/01/1903NOTE - 01 5/24/90 ORD: GRANTG MOTION FOR NOTE - 01 RECONSIDERATION TO EXTENT THAT NOTE - 02 APPPLICANT'S PERMISSION FOR NOTE - 02 ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL SHALL BE NOTE - 03 TREATED AS A NOTICE OF APPEAL NOTE - 03 TIMELY FILED; APPLICANT TO NOTE - 04 TENDER $50 FEE, FILE DOCKETING NOTE - 04 STMT, DESIG OF RECORD AND STMT NOTE - 05 REGARDING TRANSCRIPT W/IN 10 NOTE - 05 DAYS.
10/05/1989MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF APPELLANT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPLICATION PUR. TO DC CODE 11-721 RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
10/05/1989RECEIVED APLT'S PERMISSION FOR ALLOW- ANCE OF APPEAL PURSUANT TO DC CODE 11-721 RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
10/05/1989NOTICE OF APPEAL
10/25/1989RECEIVED COPY OF ORDER FROM JUDGE WERTHEIM DENYING MOTION FOR RE CONSIDERATION RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
11/28/1989ORDER DENYING APPLICANT'S MOT FOR AN ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO FILE APPLICATION. FVH PANELRO SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
12/01/1989MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF APLT AD PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
05/24/1990ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 01-05 CWC PANELBESCPY SCDATE 051190 SCHPRD VS
06/08/1990DESIGNATION OF RECORD & SRT RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
06/08/1990APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT RJG PANEL SCDATE 060890 SCHPRD DSA
06/08/1990$50.00 DOCKETING FEE GG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
08/20/1992NOTE Sent copy of DR & SRT to appeals coordinators office.
09/01/1992APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY OF DISMISSAL
09/01/1992MOTION(S) FEE PAID
09/22/1992ORDER Appellant's motion to stay dismissal is granted to the extent that appellant shall advise this court as to the status of the resolution of the issues on appeal on or before October 15, 1992.
11/13/1992ORDER Appellant shall within 15 days file the record with this court forthwith.(WHN)
11/19/1992COPY OF SUPERIOR COURT LETTER to aplt counsel dtd 11/18/92 re record pick-up
12/01/1992RECORD ON APPEAL w/ exhibit one brown envelope
12/01/1992RECORD COMPLETED
12/18/1992ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By WHN)
01/14/1993APPELLANT'S BRIEF
02/19/1993APPELLEE'S BRIEF
02/19/1993BRIEFS COMPLETED
03/22/1993FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
06/15/1993FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
06/15/1993SUBMITTED (ST,SC,RE)
07/07/1993AFFIRMED MOJ (ST,SC,RE)
07/13/1993APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
07/13/1993MOTION(S) FEE PAID
07/27/1993APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's motion for reconsideration
07/28/1993MEMORANDUM - Transmitting to division aplt's oppo to the motion for reconsideration of this court's memorandum opinion and judgment issued on July 7, 1993.
09/07/1993SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1, 83 pages by Simms. Proceedings of September 21, 1989.
09/07/1993LETTER to counsel of record informing parties that the Appeals Coordinator's Office had certified the transcript of proceedings of September 21, 1989 before the Honorable Ronald P. Wertheim, in Civil Action No. 8127-89.
10/05/1993ORDER DENYING APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING (the motion for reconsideration is being treated as a petition for rehearing). The Memorandum Opinion and Judgment heretofore issued is amended by striking the word limited in the third sentence of the text and by striking that portion of the footnote appearing after the citation to D.C. App. R. 28(a)(4) & (e). In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is denied. (STSCRY)
10/13/1993MANDATE ISSUED