| Case Information: 41353 | |||
| Short Caption: | KNUTZEN VS. SIERRA PINES RESORT | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV9803990 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Disposition Filed/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | 05/15/2003 / Gang, Leonard | SP Status: | Completed |
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 05/02/2003 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Stephen C. Mollath, P.C.--check no. 3106. | ||
| 05/02/2003 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 03-07469 | |
| 05/15/2003 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Leonard I. Gang. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
| 05/16/2003 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 03-08356 | |
| 05/20/2003 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. Leonard I. Gang. (docketing statement) | ||
| 08/05/2003 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The court will receive a stipulation to dismiss this appeal. | 03-13131 | |
| 10/02/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. The settlement judge has filed a report indicating that the parties have agreed to a settlement. Appellant shall have 30 days to file a stipulation or motion to dismiss or otherwise inform this court of the status of this appeal. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. | 03-16363 | |
| 10/23/2003 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from attorney Stephen Mollath enclosing copy of proposed stipulation to dismiss which has been sent to counsel. | 03-17701 | |
| 10/28/2003 | Motion | Filed Stipulation/Dismiss Appeal. | 03-18027 | |
| 12/15/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Stipulation Disapproved. The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this appeal "without prejudice." While parties may agree to voluntarily dismiss an appeal, see NRAP 42(b), this court will only dismiss an appeal with prejudice. We disapprove the stipulation. Appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file a stipulation or motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice or otherwise inform this court of the status of this appeal. We caution appellant that failure to timely comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. | 03-20808 | |
| 01/22/2004 | Settlement Program Motion/Stipulation | Filed Settlement Program/Stipulated Dismissal. | 04-01352 | |
| 02/04/2004 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Stipulated Dismissal. Pursuant to the settlement conference, the stipulation of the parties and cause appearing, " . . . this appeal is dismissed." NRAP 42(b). SNP/CLK | 04-02180 | |
| 02/04/2004 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No remittitur issued. | ||
| 02/13/2004 | Motion | Filed Motion. Respondents Toiyabe Investment Company and Montreux Joint Venture's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs pursuant to NRAP 38 and 39. | 04-02866 | |
| 02/23/2004 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Appellant Victor K. Knutzen, M.D.'s Opposition to Respondent's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs Pursuant to Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure 38 and 39. | 04-03366 | |
| 03/22/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. Respondents Toiyabe Investment Company and Montreux Joint Venture (collectively 'Montreux') have moved for attorney fees and costs pursuant to NRAP 38 and 39. Appellant opposes the motion. We conclude that this appeal was neither frivolous nor taken for purposes of delay or to misuse the appellate court processes. See NRAP 38. We further conclude that an award of costs is inappropriate because costs on appeal are only taxable for the printing and copying of briefs and appendices and travel to and from oral argument. See NRAP 39(c). Accordingly, we deny Montreux's motion. | 04-05357 | |