| Case Information: 90-SP-1516 | |||
| Short Caption: | WMATA V. NELLO L. TEER COMPANY | Classification: | Appeals - Special Proceedings - Certified Question Of Law |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | 89-7274 | Filed Date: | 12/11/1990 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 12/11/1990 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 04/08/1991 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | 05/28/1991 | ||
| Argued/Submitted: | 06/25/1991 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | |||
| Party Information | ||||||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
| Petitioner | Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority | N |
| |||||||||
| Respondent | Nello L. Terr Company | N |
| |||||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 01/01/1901 | WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY NELLO L. TEER COMPANY | |||
| 01/01/1902 | ||||
| 01/01/1903 | NOTE - 01 4/8/91 ORD: APLT SHALL FL BRF NOTE - 01 ADDRESSING ALL 3 CERTIFIED NOTE - 02 QUESTIONS W/I 30 DAYS FRM DATE NOTE - 02 OF THIS ORDER; APLE SHALL FL NOTE - 03 BRF ADDRESSING SAME QUESTIONS NOTE - 03 W/IN 20 DAYS THEREAFTER & APLT NOTE - 04 MAY FL REPLY BRF LIMITED TO NOTE - 04 THE FIRST TWO QUEST. W/I 10 NOTE - 05 DAYS AFTER BRF OF APLE IS FLD. NOTE - 05 CLEK IS DIRECTED TO SCHED CASE NOTE - 06 FOR ARGUMENT ON JUNE REGULAR NOTE - 06 CALENDAR. | |||
| 01/01/1905 | TRDATE- 91/06/25 ACTION - ARG ATTY 1 - ENGLERTR FOR - PETITIONER ATTY 2 - MANNRI FOR - RESPONDENT | |||
| 12/11/1990 | CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF LAW US COURT APPEALS FROM USCA (DC) PURSUANT TO DC CODE 11-723(d) GG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 12/11/1990 | RECEIVED FROM USCA (DC) APPELLANT'S BRIEF (WMATA) GG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 12/11/1990 | RECEIVED FROM USCA (DC) APPELLEE'S BRIEF (NELLO) GG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 12/11/1990 | RECEIVED FROM USCA (DC) REPLY BRIEF FOR WASHINGTON METRO AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 12/11/1990 | RECEIVED FROM USCA (DC) REPLY BRIEF OF NELLO L. TEER COMPANY GG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 12/11/1990 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 01/08/1991 | RECEIVED LETTER FOR APLT RE: CASE ON APPEAL AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 01/09/1991 | STATEMENT OF APPELLEE PURSUANT TO RULE 54(B) RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 01/10/1991 | ORDER ALL PARTIES TO FILE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 54 (b)(1) ON OR BEFORE 1/24/91 GG PANELRO SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 01/18/1991 | STATEMENT OF APLE PURSANT TO RUL (54) AJ PANEL SCDATE 012491 SCHPRD STATE | |||
| 01/22/1991 | MEMORANDUM 1/10/91 ORDER RE-SENT TO APLT GG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 01/23/1991 | STATEMENT OF APPELLANT PURSUANT TO RULE 54(b)(1) rjg PANEL SCDATE 013191 SCHPRD STATE | |||
| 04/08/1991 | ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS (1 THRU 6). CT PANELFESTFA SCDATE 030191 SCHPRD VS | |||
| 04/08/1991 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 05/08/1991 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF RJG PANEL SCDATE 050891 SCHPRD BA | |||
| 05/10/1991 | MEMORANDUM TRANSMITTING BA TO DIVISION. MEH PANELRBH SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 05/10/1991 | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 OF APLT PURSUANT TO RULE 28a AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 05/28/1991 | RESPONDENT'S BRIEF RJG PANEL SCDATE 052891 SCHPRD BE | |||
| 05/28/1991 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
| 05/29/1991 | MEMORANDUM TRANSMITTING BE TO DIVISION. MEH PANELJAC SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 06/07/1991 | PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF RJG PANEL SCDATE 060791 SCHPRD RBA | |||
| 06/10/1991 | MEMORANDUM TRANSMITTING RBA TO DIVISION. KHO PANELJAC SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 06/25/1991 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
| 06/25/1991 | ARGUED PANELTEFAWG SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 12/18/1992 | AFFIRMED Question of law from US Court of Appeals. | |||
| 03/12/1993 | ORDER by the court, sua sponte, that the opinion in this case filed December 18, 1992, is amended as follows: On page 5, in the first full paragraph, last sentence (618 A.2d at 130, second column, beginning at line 32, nevertheless affirmed the General Manager's award of interest in the instant case on the ground that .... is changed to read: nevertheless reversed the General Manager's decision and reinstated the Board's award of $58,870 in pre-judgment interest, on the ground that ..... (TE FA WA) | |||