judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

NAVAS VS. RANKIN

Case Information: 45104
Short Caption:NAVAS VS. RANKINCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 44981 , 45242
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV0402471Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:08/11/2005How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
04/20/2005Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
04/20/2005Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 05-07686
05/13/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due in District Court Case No. CV0402471: 120 days. fn 1--[See NRAP 11(a)(2) (providing that the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings.)] The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court. 05-09371
08/11/2005Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Copy. Nos. 44981/45104 (05-15966). (Cases are not consolidated).
08/11/2005Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
08/26/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement. Appellant must file the appeal statement on or before 10/05/05. No response required unless ordered by this court. (Pilot program civil appeal statement mailed to proper person appellant.) 09/14/05 Order: we vacate the August 26 order; appellant is no longer required to file a civil proper person appeal statement in this appeal.jcr 05-16954
08/30/2005Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. Order Dismissing Appeals (Nos. 44981 and 45104) and Directing Transmission of a Supplemental Record. These proper person appeals challenge several district court orders granting motions to dismiss in a real property dispute. Our review of the appeals in Docket Nos. 44981 and 45104 reveals jurisdictional defects. As we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeals in Docket Nos. 44981 and 45104. 'We dismiss the appeal.' We note that appellant may challenge the March 16 and 31 interlocutory orders within the context of his appeal in Docket No. 45242 from the final order in this matter. fn4[We direct the clerk of this court to add respondents Western Title Company, David Rankin, Carol Stokes, the Honorable Deborah Schumacher, District Judge, and Ronald A. Longtin, Jr. to the caption in Docket No. 45242.] We have reviewed the documents on file in Docket No. 45242, and we conclude that our review of the complete record is warranted. We direct the clerk of this court to file, in Docket No. 45242, the record that was ordered transmitted in Docket Nos. 44981 and 45104. Within 120 days from the date of this order, the clerk of the district court shall transmit to the clerk of this court a certified copy of a supplemental trial court record in District Court Case No. CV0402471, which shall include copies of any documents not already included in the record on appeal. fn6[See NRAP 11(a)(2) (providing that the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings).] The supplemental record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court. NNP05-WM/MD/RP. Nos. 44981/45104/45242 – cases are not consolidated. 05-17187
08/30/2005Other Other. Record on Appeal initially filed in Docket Nos. 44981 and 45104 on August 11, 2005. Pursuant to the Order filed on August 30, 2005, the Record was transferred to Docket No. 45242. Nos. 44981/45104/45242 – cases are not consolidated.jcr
09/14/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Vacating Prior Order. On August 26, 2005, an order was entered directing proper person appellant to file a civil proper person appeal statement. On August 30, 2005 this appeal was dismissed. We vacate the August 26 order; appellant is no longer required to file a civil proper person appeal statement in this appeal. 05-18174
09/21/2005Other Returned Unfiled Document. Original and one copy of each document entitled, "Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement." (4 different versions)
09/27/2005RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 05-17380
09/27/2005Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
09/30/2005RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by District Court Clerk on September 28, 2005. 05-17380