| Case Information: 90-DA-1256 | |||
| Short Caption: | MICHAEL SINDRAM V. RUFUS J. KING III | Classification: | Discretionary - Discretionary - Other Discretionary Applicatn |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | Filed Date: | ||
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | Case Status: | Closed | |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | |||
| Party Information | |||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
| Appellant | Michael Sindram | N | Pro Se | N | |
| Appellee | Rufus J. King, III | N | Pro Se | N | |
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 01/01/1901 | SINDRAM, MICHAEL KING III, RUFUS J. SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE | |||
| 01/01/1902 | (TEAM 1) 10/30/91 MMP | |||
| 10/17/1990 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPELLANT'S RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 10/17/1990 | RECEIVED APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS: RELIEF FROM ORDER RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 11/01/1990 | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF APLT FOR LEAVE TO ADD PARTY AD PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 02/26/1991 | Filed | OUTCOME/DISPOSITION - Outcome-Disposition | ||
| 02/26/1991 | ORDER GRANT FORMA PAUP; DENY MO TO ADD PARTY; DENY PET FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DAS PANELFESCMK SCDATE 111390 SCHPRD OPE | |||
| 02/26/1991 | DISP NO - 01 DISP - D METH -ORD JUDGE -PC CITE | |||
| 02/26/1991 | DENIED | |||
| 03/13/1991 | MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION OF APLT CLARIFICATION AND MODIFICATION OF ORDER AND FOR RELATED RELIEF AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 04/04/1991 | ORDER DENY MO OF PTNR FOR CLARIFICA- TION & MODIFICATION OF 2/26/91 ORD. DAS PANELFESCMK SCDATE 032191 SCHPRD VS | |||
| 04/09/1991 | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF APLT WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS RELIEF FROM ORDER AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/29/1994 | ORDER the the petition for writ of coram nobis construed as a motion to reconsider the April 4, 1991, order, and as such, denied. F/O that petitioner's in forma pauperis status is hereby revoked. F/O that the Clerk shall not accept for filing any further paper from petitioner unless it is accompanied by the proper fee or a new motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis that contains complete and specific answers to all questions, including questions 1b and 2a, regarding total income received monthly and over the last 12 months. Additional, any paper must specifically designate, on its face, the appeal in which it is to be filed. F/O the Clerk shall not accept for filing any further paper from appellant that designateds unconsolidated appeals and appellant shall, in any further filing, file a separate filing for each unconsolidated appeal. F/O that appellant shall communicate with this court only throug properly filed motions. See D.C. App. R. 33. (by: FESCMK) | |||