judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

DUNMORE HOMES VS. DIST. CT. (YORK)

Case Information: 44931
Short Caption:DUNMORE HOMES VS. DIST. CT. (YORK)Court:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A433826Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus/Prohibition
Disqualifications:Case Status:Disposition Filed/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
03/21/2005Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
03/21/2005Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. and Motion for Consolidation. 05-05454
03/21/2005AppendixFiled Appendix. Volumes 1 through 3, and Supplemental Appendix. 05-05462
03/21/2005Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
03/22/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. filed March 21, 2005. Petitioners have moved to consolidate this petition with the writ petition in Beazer Homes v. District Court, Docket No. 43174. No good cause appearing, we deny the motion to consolidate. 05-05613
03/30/2005Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Beckley Singleton - check no. 20819.
04/25/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. The real parties in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writs. 05-08122
05/16/2005MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. to file Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. 05-09556
05/25/2005Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. w/attached courtesy copy of letter dated May 19, 2005 addressed to Daniel F. Polsenberg, Esq. 05-10334
06/02/2005MotionFiled Stipulation. 05-10880
06/07/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Show Cause. Petitioners shall have seven days to show cause why their petition should not be denied based on the fact that petitioners apparently have a speedy and adequate legal remedy available to them. Additionally, we direct petitioners to provide this court with a copy of the district court order granting their motion for reconsideration of the class certification. Fn 2-[We defer ruling on the real parties in interest's motion to supplement the record and enlarge the time for filing an answer.] 05-11155
06/15/2005MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. 05-11758
07/28/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Stipulation Approved. On April 25, 2005, we directed the real parties in interest to file an answer to the instant petition. On June 2, 2005, the parties filed a stipulation, stating that petitioners may file supplemental points and authorities to their petition, and that they shall have 5 days from the date of entry of the district court's order resolving petitioners' pending motion to decertify the class to file and serve those supplemental points and authorities. The real parties in interest shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of petitioners' supplemental points and authorities to file their answer to both the petition and petitioners' supplemental points and authorities. We approve the stipulation. fn1[In light of this order we deny as moot the real parties in interest's May 16, 2005 motion for an extension of the time in which to file their answer.] We caution both petitioners and the real parties in interest, that no further extensions shall be granted absent extreme and unforeseeable circumstances. fn2[On June 7, 2005, this court directed petitioners to show cause why their petition should not be denied based on their filing another motion to decertify the class in the underlying case, which appeared to give petitioners' a speedy and adequate remedy at law. It appears that the district court has denied petitioners' motion; therefore, this petition will not be denied at this time based on the availability of a speedy and adequate remedy at law.] 05-14968
08/16/2005Petition/WritFiled Supplement to Petition for Writ. Supplemental Points and Authorities 05-16187
08/16/2005Petition/WritFiled Supplement to Petition for Writ. Addendum to Supplemental Points and Authorities. 05-16188
08/16/2005AppendixFiled Appendix. Appendix to Supplemental Points and Authorities, Volumes 1 and 2. 05-16190
09/14/2005Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Writ. Opposition of Real Parties in Interest to Petition for Writ. 05-18199
09/14/2005AppendixFiled Appendix. Appendix to Opposition of Real Parties in Interest. 05-18200
10/03/2005MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Expedited Consideration. 05-19563
10/03/2005MotionFiled Motion for Permission to File Document. Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Dunmore's Petition for Writ. 05-19565
10/13/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. We grant petitioners' motions. Accordingly, the clerk of this court shall file petitioners' reply and the accompanying appendix, provisionally received on October 3, 2005. Additionally, this court's consideration of the petition will be expedited to the extent that this court's docket allows. 05-20301
10/13/2005Petition/WritFiled Reply to Answer to Petition. 05-19567
10/13/2005AppendixFiled Appendix. Appendix to Reply. 05-19568
03/21/2006Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Show Cause. Petitioners: 15 days to show cause or if petition has been rendered moot, petitioners shall so inform this court within that same period. We also direct petitioners to provide this court with a copy of any district court order decertifying the underlying class action. 06-05940
03/27/2006MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Joint Voluntary Dismissal of Writ Petition. 06-06393
04/21/2006Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Petition. Dismissing Petition for Writ of Prohibition or Mandamus. We grant the joint motion for voluntary dismissal of this petition and, " . . . dismiss this petition as moot." The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. NNP06-RR/MD/RP 06-08475
04/21/2006Case Status Update Case Closed. No notice in lieu of remittitur issued.