| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 01/01/1901 | | JOYNER, ELISE ET Al JONATHAN WOODNER COMPANY ET AL | |
| 01/01/1902 | | TO MMP FILED 3/5/92 | |
| 01/01/1903 | | NOTE - 01 11-5-90 SR#2(78 PGS/TAPE; NOTE - 01 55 PGS/ARITS; 27 PGS/EDLEY; NOTE - 02 13 PGS/RUST; 27 PGS/WILLIAMS; NOTE - 02 39 PGS/HOLLAND; 25 PGS/BURNS; NOTE - 03 158 PGS/GRAYBILL; 48P JACKSON; NOTE - 03 80 PGS/SWARINGER; 10P BREMEN; NOTE - 04 64 PGS GLEASON; 68 PGS/BURNEY; NOTE - 04 58 PGS/BRADLEY; & 310PG/GOAD. NOTE - 05 4/5/91 ORD: GRANT MO OF APLES NOTE - 05 TO FL SUPP BRF IN SUPPORT OF NOTE - 06 MO TO DISMISS; DENY MO'S OF NOTE - 06 APLT TO STRIKE MO TO DIMISS NOTE - 07 ARE DENIED; GRANT MO OF APLES NOTE - 07 TO DISMISS 90-540 & DENY MO TO NOTE - 08 DISMISS 90-541; LTR OF CNSL NOTE - 08 FOR APLES ASKING THE CRT NOT NOTE - 09 TO CONS CASES TO BE TREATED AS NOTE - 09 A MO & IS DENIED; SS, CONS NOTE - 10 90-362 & 90-541 & APLTS IN 90- NOTE - 10 362 SHALL BE DEEMED AS APLTS NOTE - 11 FOR THE PURPOSE OF RULE 28 & NOTE - 11 35(e); MO OF APLTS TO REDACT NOTE - 12 90-541 FROM REC & RT TRANSMIT- NOTE - 12 TED TO THE CRT IS DENIED; DENY NOTE - 13 MO OF APLTS TO MODIFY APLES NOTE - 13 COUNTER DESIG OF REC; DENY MOS NOTE - 14 OF APLT IN 90-540 TO EXT TM TO NOTE - 14 FL DSA, DR & SRT AS MOOT; BRF NOTE - 15 APLES-X-APLT, JONATHAN WOODNER NOTE - 15 DUE IN 40 DAYS. NOTE - 16 CON 90-362 NOTE - 16 NOTE - 17 10/2/91 ORD: APLTS-X-APLES, NOTE - 17 ELISE JOYNER, ET AL. MAY FL A NOTE - 18 BRF NOT TO EXCEED 100 PGS BY NOTE - 18 11/5/91; APLES-X-APLTS, JONA- NOTE - 19 THAN WOODNER, ET AL. MAY EACH NOTE - 19 FL A REPLY BRF NOT TO EXCEED NOTE - 20 25 PGS W/IN 30 DAYS AFTER THE NOTE - 20 BRF OF ELISE JOYNER IS FL; CLK NOTE - 21 THEN TO SCHED CASES AS SOON NOTE - 21 AS CAL PERMITS; EXCEPT AS PRO- NOTE - 22 VIDED IN THIS ORD, THE MO'S NOTE - 22 OF THE PARTIES ARE IN ALL NOTE - 23 OTHER RESPECTS DENIED. NOTE - 23 NOTE - 24 12/23/91 ORD: GRANT MO OF APLE NOTE - 24 -X-APLT FOR LV TO FL SUPP BRF NOTE - 25 & CLK TO FL SUPP BRF; GRANT MO NOTE - 25 OF APLT-X-APLE TO MODIFY THIS NOTE - 26 CRT'S ORD OF 10/2/91; BRF OF NOTE - 26 APLT-X-APLE ELISE JOYNER SHALL NOTE - 27 BE FL IN 90; MO TO DISMISS IS NOTE - 27 REFERRED TO THE MO'S DIV. | |
| 03/26/1990 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 05/10/1990 | | $50.00 DOCKETING FEE AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 05/10/1990 | | RECEIVED DOCKETING STATEMENT (APLT) AJ PANEL SCDATE 051090 SCHPRD DSA | |
| 05/18/1990 | | ORDER DIRG APLTS, W/IN 10 DAYS, TO FILE DR/SRT & $50 FEE OR APPEAL TO BE DISMISD. FVH PANELRO SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 05/24/1990 | | COUNTER DESIGNATION OF RECORD RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 05/29/1990 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 06/19/1990 | | RECEIVED AMENDED CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 07/03/1990 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL JT PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 07/11/1990 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 07/23/1990 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION TO APLT'S MO TO STRIKE AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 07/24/1990 | | RECEIVED COPY OF ORDER DATED 6-15-90 FROM SUPERIOR COURT PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 08/02/1990 | | RECEIVED COPY OF ORDER OF JUDGE SALZMAN DATED 8/1/90 FILED IN TRIAL COURT RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 08/23/1990 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE (DIAZ) APLE'S MO TO DISMISS APLT'S CROSS APPEAL AD PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 08/23/1990 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DR & SRTIN 90-540 (DIAZ) AND SRT, AND DSA TO 9-30-90 AD PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/05/1990 | | RECORD ON APPEAL AD PANEL SCDATE 070190 SCHPRD R | |
| 11/05/1990 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1(EXHIBITS 3-4-81 & 4-18-89) AD PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/05/1990 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2(SEE NOTE FIELDS 1-4) AD PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/05/1990 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 11/07/1990 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD VOLUME VII SEE 90-738 AD PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/07/1990 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD VOLUME VI SEE 90-738 AD PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/07/1990 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD VOLUME V SEE 90-738 AD PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/07/1990 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD VOLUME I (SEE 738) RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/07/1990 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD IN 90-738 SEE NOTE FIELDS 34 THRU 39) RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/07/1990 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD VOLUME III IN 90-738 SEE NOTE FIELDS 40 THRU 44) RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/07/1990 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD VOLUME IV IN 90-738 (SEE NOTE FIELDS 45 - 50) RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/13/1990 | | APPELLANT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITIONTO NOVEMBER 20, 1990 RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/16/1990 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (2 WHITE POSTER BOARDS; 5 MANILLA ENVELOPES & 2 TAPES) RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 12/03/1990 | | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF APLE MO TO FILE SUPP. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MO TO DISMISS APLT'S CROSS-APPEALS AD PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 12/11/1990 | | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF APLT MO TO REDACT 90-541 & TRANSCRIPT TRANSMITTED TO THE CT & REQUIRE COMPLANCE R.10 AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 12/11/1990 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION TO APLE'S MO TO FL SUPPLEMENT BR IN SUPPORT OF MO TO DIS APLT'S CROSS APPEALS AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 12/18/1990 | | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF APLT TO MODIFY APLE'S COUNTER DESIGNATION OF THE RECORD AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 12/20/1990 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION TO APLT'S MOTION TO REDACT 90-541 FROM RECORD & RT, ETC. RJG PANEL SCDATE 122490 SCHPRD OPE | |
| 12/20/1990 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO MODIFY APLE'S COUNTER-DESIGNA- TION OF RECORD RJG PANEL SCDATE 122090 SCHPRD OPE | |
| 12/20/1990 | | RECEIVED APLE'S REPLY TO APLT'S OPPO TO APLE'S MO FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPP. BRIEF RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 12/20/1990 | | APPELLEE'S REPLY TO APLT'S OPPO TO APLE'S MO FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPP. BRIEF RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 01/03/1991 | | RECEIVED APPELLANT'S REPLY TO APLES OPPO TO MO TO MODIFY APLE'S CDR RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 01/03/1991 | | RECEIVED APPELLANT'S REPLY TO APLES MO TO REDACT 90-541 FROM RECORD & RT TRANSMITTED TO COURT RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 04/05/1991 | | ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 05-15. DAS PANELTEFAGA SCDATE 032091 SCHPRD VS | |
| 04/19/1991 | | ORDER GRANTG JOIN MO OF APLTS TO ORD REALLOCATG ALLOWABLE PAGES IN THEIR BRIEF. GW PANELRO SCDATE 040891 SCHPRD V | |
| 05/14/1991 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (MEMO OF PT'S & AUTHORITIES IN OPPO OF PLANITIFFS'S MO FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 05/15/1991 | | APPELEE'S BRIEF THE ESTATE OF JONATHAN WOODNER RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 05/15/1991 | | APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S BRIEF JONATHAN WOODNER CO., ET AL APPENDIX ATTACHED PMB PANEL SCDATE 051591 SCHPRD BEA | |
| 05/15/1991 | | APPELEE'S BRIEF OF STEVE Z. LAUFER & LIST AND APPENDIX FILED 5/28/91 RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 05/16/1991 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #5 (48 PGS/TREMEL) PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 05/16/1991 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #4 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 05/24/1991 | | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF APLT X APLE JOINT FOR AN ORDER CLARIFYING THE BRIEFING SCHD AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 06/03/1991 | | OPPOSITION TO JOINT MOTION OF APLT X APLE FOR ORDER CLARIFYING THE BRIEFING SCHD AJ PANEL SCDATE 060591 SCHPRD OP | |
| 06/07/1991 | | LETTER FROM APLT'S COUNSEL IN 90-362 RE: SCHEDULING OF PLGS. ON APPEAL RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 06/07/1991 | | REPLY OF APLE-X-APLT TO APLT-X-APLES OPPOSITION TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORD CLARIFYING BRIEFG SCHED RG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 06/14/1991 | | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF APLE TO SET DT FOR THE FL OF APLE'S BR. 3 BR IN 90-362 & FL OF APLE SINGLE BRIEF AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 06/14/1991 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 06/25/1991 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION TO APLE'S MO TO ST DT FLIN OF APLE'S 3 BR IN 90-362 & FL OF APLT'S SLG BR IN A 90-541 AJ PANEL SCDATE 062691 SCHPRD OPA | |
| 07/01/1991 | | APPELLEE'S REPLY TO APLT'S OP OT APLE MO TO SET DT FOR THE FL OF APLT 3 BR IN & THE FL OF APLT AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 10/02/1991 | | ORDER SEE NOTE FILEDS 17-23. DAS PANELRO SCDATE 062191 SCHPRD Q | |
| 10/11/1991 | | APLT MOTION FOR LV TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRF/MEMO (JOINT) AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 10/18/1991 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION TO APLT'S JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPP. BRIEF RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 10/23/1991 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY TO APLE'S OPP TO JOINT OF APLT FOR LV TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 10/31/1991 | | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF APPELLEE'S IN 90-362 TO MODIFY ORDER OF 10/2/91 RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/01/1991 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION APLT X APLE TO APLE X APLT MO TO MODIFY ORD 10/2/91 IN IN 90-362 AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/08/1991 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/08/1991 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 11/15/1991 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION TO MDSE FILED 11/8/91 PANEL SCDATE 112091 SCHPRD OPA | |
| 11/19/1991 | | APPELLEE'S REPLY TO APLT-x-APLE'S OPPO TO MOTION TO DISMISS 90-541 RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 12/23/1991 | | ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 24-27. DAS PANELRO SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 03/05/1992 | | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF APPELLANT'S TO FURTHER MODIFY ORDER OF 10/2/91 RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 03/05/1992 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID FOR MMP RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 03/12/1992 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY to aple-x-aplt's motion to further modify order of 10/2/91. | |
| 03/30/1992 | | RECEIVED appellee-x-appellant appendix of key pleadings, transcripts | |
| 04/01/1992 | | RECEIVED - supplement to motion to further modify order 10/2/91 | |
| 04/09/1992 | | ORDER Deny motion of appellee-x-appellant, Jonathan Wooder, to dismiss appeal. (By KG-RY-PY) | |
| 04/22/1992 | | ORDER This court's order of 4/17/92 is amended to the extent that the Clerk shall file the brief of Elise Joyner, et al.; Reply brief of Jonathan Woonder Company, if any, shall be filed on or before 5/14/92 and shall not to exceed 40 pages. (By RO) | |
| 04/22/1992 | | APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S BRIEF (Elise Joyner, et al.) | |
| 04/22/1992 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 05/13/1992 | | AMICUS CURIAE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF | |
| 05/14/1992 | | APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF | |
| 05/14/1992 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF (steve z. laufer) | |
| 05/14/1992 | | RECEIVED Appellant/Cross-Appellee, Jonathan Woodner Company, reply brief with appendix. | |
| 05/15/1992 | | APLT-X-APLE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF | |
| 05/20/1992 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to motion of Shipley Corporation & the Estate of Ian Woodner for leave to file Amici Curiae brief in opposition to plaintiff's cross-appeal (90-541). | |
| 05/26/1992 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to strike aple. joint brief in appeal # 90-541 | |
| 05/27/1992 | | MOTION(S) FEE DUE | |
| 05/27/1992 | | RECEIVED reply of Shipley Corporation and the Estate of Ian Woodner in support of their motion for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief in opposition to plaintiff's cross-appeal. | |
| 06/02/1992 | | APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION TO APPELLES'S /CROSS-APPELLANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE APPELLEES' JOINT BRIEF IN 90cv541 | |
| 06/05/1992 | | APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S REPLY to opposition to motion to strike | |
| 06/05/1992 | | APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to opposition to motion to strike | |
| 06/12/1992 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
| 06/22/1992 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
| 07/08/1992 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to clarify this court's orders of April 17 & April 22, 1992, and to reallocate the allowable pages in appellants-x-appellees' respective reply briefs. ORDERED that appellants-x-appellees shall file, forthwith, their replies of not more that 40 pages, to be allocated among appellants-x-appellees as follows: the Jonathan Woodner Company's reply of not more than 20 pages, the Estate of Jonathan Woodner's reply of not more than 10 pages and Steven Laufer's reply of not more than 10 pages. F/O that appellees-x-appellants' request for 30 days in which to file thier reply brief after appellants-x-appellees replies are filed is granted. (JWR) | |
| 07/08/1992 | | ORDER GRANTING AC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF and the lodged brief of Shipley Corp. and the Estate of Ian Woodner is filed. | |
| 07/08/1992 | | AMICUS CURIAE'S BRIEF of Shipley Corporation and the Estate of Ian Woodner. | |
| 07/14/1992 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION CROSS APLES' JOINT MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S JULY 8, 1992 ORDER | |
| 07/16/1992 | | APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to appellant-x-appellee's joint motion for reconsideration of the court's July 8, 1992 order. | |
| 07/17/1992 | | APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE in support of appellants/cross -appellees' joint motion for reconsederation of court's 7/8/92 order | |
| 08/28/1992 | | ORDER GRANTING in part the joint motion of appellants/cross-appellees to the extent that the lodged reply breifs of appellants/cross-appellees, The Estate of Jonathan Woodner and Steven Laufer, are accepted for filing. (J Terry) | |
| 08/28/1992 | | ORDER DENYING in part the joint motion of appellants/cross-appellees to the extent that the reply brief of appellant/cross-appellee, The Jonathan Woodner Company, is in excess of the page limits specified in this court's July 8, 1992, order, and the Clerk shall return said reply brief to appellant/cross-appellee so that a proper reply brief can be filed. F/O that appellant/cross-appellee, The Jonathan Woodner Company, shall file a reply brief of no more than 20 pages with this court on or before September 16, 1992. (J Terry) | |
| 09/16/1992 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF (APPENDIX OF TRANSCRIPT PAGES CITED IN REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT THE JONATHAN WOODER CO.) | |
| 10/13/1992 | | APLE-X-APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF. | |
| 10/13/1992 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 10/15/1992 | | APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to fourth request for extension of time and request for two separate one-hour arguments in these consolidated cases. | |
| 10/30/1992 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |
| 11/05/1992 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION for merits division to substutute real parties in interest as aple's, or to add intervenors in appeal no. 90 CV 541 | |
| 11/05/1992 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 11/06/1992 | | ORDER On consideration of appellees/cross-appellants' motion for a brief extension of time within which to file the reply brief, motion for extended argument, appellants/cross-appellees' opposition to those motions, and the motion for extended argument contained therein, it is ORDERED on behalf of the merits division assigned to consider these appeals appeals that appellees'cross-appellants' motion for a brief extension of time is granted, and appellees/cross-appellants' reply brief shall be filed on or before October 30, 1992. It is F/O that appellants/cross-appellees' and appellees/cross-appellants' motions to extend time for oral argument are denied (WHN) | |
| 11/12/1992 | | AMICUS CURIAE'S OPPOSITION to motion to substitute themas real parties in interest or as intervenors in appeal no. 90-cv-541. | |
| 11/16/1992 | | ORDER sua sponte on behalf of the merits division assigned to consider this appeal that this appeal is hereby removed from the regular calendar of Monday, November 23, 1992, at 9:30 a.m. Argument will be scheduled after resolution of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc filed in Nos. 87-CV-238 and 87-CV-283, Bernstein v. Fernandez (D.C. March 28, 1991). (WHN) | |
| 11/16/1992 | | CASE STAYED until disposition of 87-CV-238. | |
| 11/17/1992 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
| 12/17/1992 | | MEMORANDUM Transmitting to division correspondence received from appellees/cross-appellants pursuant to Rule 28 (k) | |
| 12/18/1992 | | ORDER On consideration of the motion of appellants in no. 90-CV-541 to substitute real parties in interest as appellees, or to add intervenors in appeal no. 90-CV-541, and the opposition of amici curiae to said motion, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied. STFAKG | |
| 06/23/1993 | | COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS aple/cross aplt (Joyner) | Granted |
| 06/23/1993 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 07/14/1993 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY to response to motion withdraw appearance on behalf of certain aples in appeal 90 cv 362 and certainaplts in appeal 90 cv 541 | |
| 07/27/1993 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
| 08/05/1993 | | ORD GRT COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASON (of aples-x-aplts), and the appearance of Roy L. Pearson, Esquire, is hereby withdrawn. F/O that appellees/cross-appellants, Elise Joyner and Clarece Thame, shall advise this court within 30 days from the date of this order as to the identity of new counsel or if they intend to proceed on appeal pro se. (BY J Terry) | |
| 09/08/1993 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to request an extension of time to advise this court of new counsel. (evh) | |
| 09/08/1993 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 09/28/1993 | | ORDER GRANT APLE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION (cross-appellants), and appellees-x-appellants shall advise this court within 30 days from the date of this order as to the identity of new counsel. (BY WHN) | |
| 10/28/1993 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to request a further extension of time to advise court of new counsel. | |
| 10/28/1993 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 11/30/1993 | | ORDER GRANT APLE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION (cross-appellants), and appellees-x-appellants shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the identity of new counsel. (BY: WHN) (evh) | |
| 01/14/1994 | | ORDER: Appellees-x-appellants shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the statement regarding the identity of new counsel, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the statement out of time. Failure to comply will result in appellees-x-appellants proceedings with this appeal on a pro se basis. (By: WHN) | |
| 02/04/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file out of time a motion to request a further extension oftime to advise the court of new counsel. (aples-x-aplts in 90cv362) | |
| 02/04/1994 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 02/04/1994 | | RECEIVED motion to request a further extension of time to advise thecourt of the identity of new counsel. | |
| 02/04/1994 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 03/08/1994 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION (aples-x-aplts) for leave to file, out of time, a motion to request further extension of time to advise the court of new counsel, and the Clerk shall file the lodged motion for an extension of time to advise the court of new counsel. (More) | |
| 03/08/1994 | | ORDER GRANT APLE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION (aples-x-aplts in 90cv362) for an extension of time to advise the court of new counsel. | |
| 03/08/1994 | | ORDER GRANT APLE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION (aples-x-aplts) for an extension of time to advise the court of new counsel, and appellees-x-appellants shall advise this court of the identity of new counsel within 20 days from the date of this order. (By: JWR) | |
| 04/01/1994 | | ORDER: Appellees/cross-appellants shall proceed on appeal pro se. F/O that these appeals shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court as soon as the calendar permits. (By: JMF) | |
| 04/04/1994 | | APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to the court's order. | |
| 04/06/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL joint | |
| 04/06/1994 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 04/13/1994 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION TO JOINT MOTION UNDER RULE 42(b) TO DISMISS APPEALS AND REDUCE THE JUDGMENTS. | |
| 04/18/1994 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY in support of joint motion under Rule 42(b) to dismiss appeals and reduce the judgments. | |
| 05/11/1994 | | error | |
| 05/19/1994 | | error | |
| 09/23/1994 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL(JOINT) under Rule 42 (b) to reduce judgement. F/O that appeal no. 90-CV-362 is dismissed to the extent that any or all claims of appellees Joyner and Thame are hereby satisfied. F/O that appeal no. 90-CV-541 is dismissed as to cross-appellants Joyner and Thame only. F/O that the compensatory damage awards totalling $965,000.00 are hereby reduced by $260.000.00 to $705,000.00. F/O that the punitive damages award against the Jonathan Woodner Company of $9,000,000.00 is hereby reduced by 2/9ths to $7,000,000.00. F/O that the punitive damages award against the Estate of Jonathan Woodner of $1,500,000.00 is herey reduced by 2/9ths to 1,166,666.67. F/O that the punitive damages award against Stephen Z. Laufer of $4,500,000.00 is hereby reduced by 2/9ths to $3,500,000.00. F/O that appellants\corss-appellees and appellees\cross-appellants Joyner and Thame shall bear their own costs of these appeals. (by: STFAKG) | |
| 09/23/1994 | | PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED | |
| 09/23/1994 | | CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED by appellant's counsel B. Michael Rauh Manatt, Phelps & Phillips 1501 M Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20005 | |
| 11/08/1994 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to vacate two year long stay and for expedited claendaring of these appeals for oral argument. | |
| 11/08/1994 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 11/15/1994 | | APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION -to motion to cacte two year long stay and for expedited calendaring of these appeals for oral argument | |
| 11/23/1994 | | APPELLANT'S/Cross-Appellee's motion for a settlement conference involving all parties and counsel. | |
| 11/23/1994 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 11/28/1994 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY to opposition to motion to vacate two year long stay and for expedited claendaring of these appeals for oral argument. | |
| 12/01/1994 | | TMC - 11/8 Motion to vacate two year long stay and for expedited calendaring of these appeals for oral argument. 11/15 - Aplt-x-cross-apeles' oppo | |
| 12/06/1994 | | APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to appellants'/cross appellees' motion for a settlement conference involving all parties and counsel. | |
| 12/15/1994 | | APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELEE'S REPLY to belated opposition to motion for a settlement conference involving all parties and counsel. | |
| 12/21/1994 | | ORDER, sua sponte, that the stay issued by this court in these appeals, on November 16, 1992, is hereby lifted, and these cases shall be scheduled for oral argument as soon as the calendar permits. F/O that the motion of appellees/cross-appellants to vacate two-year stay and for expedited calendaring is DENIED AS MOOT. F/O that the motion of appellants/cross-appellees for settlement conference involving all parties and counsel is DENIED. (By: ST, FA, KG) | |
| 01/20/1995 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
| 03/03/1995 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
| 03/06/1995 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
| 03/07/1995 | | LETTER from aplt's counsel re omitted from the appendix of transcript pages filed with brief | |
| 03/09/1995 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 03/09/1995 | | ARGUED (ST,FA,KG) Walter A. Smith, Esquire, for appellant. Michael Rauh, Esquire, for appellant. Roy L. Pearson, Esquire, for appellee. | |
| 05/17/1995 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
| 05/19/1995 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to sever consolidated appeals and to expedite ruling on appeal 90-CV-362 | |
| 05/19/1995 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 05/26/1995 | | Appellant's/Cross-Appellee's motion to confirm deadline for filing joint response or, in the alternative, for an extension of time. | |
| 05/31/1995 | | APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to motion to sever consolidated appeals and to expedite ruling on appeal no. 90-CV-362. | |
| 06/02/1995 | | APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to appellant's/cross-appellee's motion to confirm deadline for filing joint response or, in the alternative, for an extension of time. (filed by: Roy L. Pearson, Jr.) | |
| 06/19/1995 | | ORDER On consideration of the motion of appellees to sever consolidated appeals and to expedite ruling onappeal No. 90-CV-362, and the response thereto, appellants' motion to confirm deadline for filing joint response, and the opposition thereto, and it appearing that appellants' response was timely filed, and appellees' motion to amend caption, it is ORDERED that appellees' motion to sever and to expedite ruling is denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellees' motion to amend caption isgranted and the caption is amended as indicated above. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motion to confirm deadline is denied as moot. (ST/FA/KG) | |
| 07/18/1995 | | CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED by appellant's counsel. B. Michael Rauh 1501 M Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20005-1702 | |
| 09/14/1995 | | AFFIRMED IN PART/REVERSED IN PART Opinion | |
| 09/28/1995 | | APLE MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PET FOR REH/REH EB to 1 day | |
| 09/28/1995 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 09/28/1995 | | APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC | |
| 09/29/1995 | | RECEIVED appellee's petition for rehearing (pending motion) | |
| 10/25/1995 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION- (EMERGENCY)-for issuance of mandate to permit execution on judgement for compensatory damages | |
| 10/25/1995 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 10/26/1995 | | RECEIVED - amended cert. of service for aplt's pet. for reh/reh en banc | |
| 10/31/1995 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to appellee's emergency motion for issuance of mandate to permit execution on judgment for compensatory damages. | |
| 11/03/1995 | | APPELLEE'S REPLY to opposition to emergency motion for issuance of mandate to permit execution on judgment for compensatory damages. | |
| 11/20/1995 | | ORDER that appellees shall file a response to aplts' petition and appellants shall file a response to aples' petition within 20 days from the date of this order. (WA) | |
| 12/11/1995 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to aple's pet. for reh/ reh en banc | |
| 12/11/1995 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's pet. for reh/reh en banc | |
| 12/22/1995 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to supp aple's pet to incorporate arguments made in oppo to aplt's pet | |
| 01/18/1996 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION for clarification, or alternatively, for leave to request the allowance of interest. | |
| 01/18/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 01/18/1996 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to correct 6 factual errors in 9/14/95 slop opin. | |
| 01/18/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 01/19/1996 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LV TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE to appellee's motion to supplement their rehearing petition. | |
| 01/19/1996 | | RECEIVED appellant's response to motion to supplement appellees' petition to incorporate arguments made in opposition to appellant' petition. | |
| 01/26/1996 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to appellants' motion for leave to respond to appellees' motion to supplement their rehearing petition for 90-CV-362 | |
| 02/01/1996 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR A ONE-DAY EXTNESION OF TIME TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR LEAVE TO RESPOND TO APPELLEE'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THEIR REHEARING PETITION. | |
| 02/01/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 02/08/1996 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LV TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE | |
| 02/08/1996 | | RECEIVED -aplt's response to aple's further supplemental arguments concerning six alleged factual errors in the court's sept 14, 1995 order opinion and clarification of the issue of nterest | |
| 02/20/1996 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY in support of appellant's motion for leave to respond to appellees further supplemental arguments in support of their petition for rehearing and their opposition to appellant's petition. | |
| 07/25/1996 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY to appellees' further supplemental arguments concerning errors in court's opinion | |
| 07/25/1996 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to motion to supplement appellees' petition to incorporate arguments made in opposition to appellants' petition | |
| 07/25/1996 | | APLE'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC | |
| 07/25/1996 | | ORDER On consideration of aplts Jonathan Woodner Co. and Stephan Z. Laufer's pet for reh/reh en banc, the opposition thereto, aples' mo to ext tm to file petition, the lodged petition, the oppo thereto, aples' mo to supplement petition, aplts' mo for leave to respond to mo to supplement, the oppo thereto, the lodged response, aplts' mo to ext tm to file reply to oppo, the lodged reply, aples' mo to correct errors in slip opinion, aplts' mo for leave to respond to mo to correct errors, the oppo, and the reply thereto, and the lodged response, it is Ordered that the motions are granted and the Clk is directed to file the lodged aples' pet for reh/reh en banc, the lodged aplts' response to mo to supplement petition, and the lodged aplts' reply to oppo to mo for leave to respond to mo to correct errors in slip opinion. It is FO by the merits division that aplts' pet for rehearing is denied. It is FO by the merits division that aples' pet for rehearing is granted only to the extent that the following new sentence shall be added at the end of the first paragraph of footnote 19 of the opinion filed Sept. 14, 1995: We do not reach any issues relating to proof of net worth where the plaintiff is not seeking an award of punitive damages based upon the wealth of the defendant, as the plaintiff did here. See Town Mgmt Corp v. Chavez, 373 A.2d 238, 246 (D.C. 1977). It is FO by the merits division that aples' motion to correct errors in slip opinion is granted only to the extent that the second sentence of the final paragraph of Part I of the opinion filed Sept. 14, 1995, is amended as follows: $30,000 should read $15,000 and $60,000 should read $75,000. It appearing that no judge of this court has called for a vote on the petitions for rehearing en banc, it is FO that the petitions for rehearing en banc are denied. (EB) (Chief Judge Wagner and Associate Judge Ferren have recused themselves from this case.) | |
| 08/02/1996 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
| 08/08/1996 | | ORDER Once the mandate has been received in the trial court, the tenants may seek to collect upon the judgment entered awarding them compensatory damages on the emotional distress claim. (Opinion ST,FA,KG) | |
| 08/21/1996 | | TMC - Motion for clarification, or alternatively, for leave to request the allowance of interest. | |
| 08/22/1996 | | ORDER This is before the court on appellees' motion for clarification, or alternatively, for leave to request the allowance of interest filed pursuant to D.C. App. R. 37. Because our resolution did not include any direction that any new judgment for money be entered in the Superior Court, and because there are only two alternatives provided for under Rule 37, the judgment for intentional infliction must be considered, for these purposes, to have been affirmed. Therefore, interest shall be payable from the date of the judgment. (ST,FA,KG) (Judge Steadman, consistent with his dissent from the entry of the order of August 8, 1996, also dissents from the entry of this order.) | |
| 08/22/1996 | | APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC | |
| 08/30/1996 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION for clarification of the panel's 8/22/96 order | |
| 08/30/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 08/30/1996 | | Appellant's motion to recall the 8/2/96 mandate and to stay execution pending resolution of the rehearing petition before this court and a certiorari petition to the United States Supreme Court. | |
| 09/06/1996 | | ORDER This is before the court on Appellants' Motion To Recall The August 2, 1996 Mandate And To Stay Execution Pending Resolution Of The Rehearing Petition Before This Court And A Certiorari Petition To The United States Supreme Court. Because the division did not intend that the mandate issue until all outstanding motions in the case were finally resolved, the issuance of the mandate on August 2, 1996, was in error. Therefore, it is Ordered that appellants' motion is granted only to the extent that it seeks recall of the mandate and stay of execution pending resolution of the rehearing petition before the court. Accordingly, it is Further Ordered that the mandate is recalled until further order of the court. (ST,FA,KG) | |
| 09/06/1996 | | MANDATE RECALLED (see September 6, 1996 order) | |
| 09/13/1996 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to aplt's motion for clarification of the panel's 8/22/96 order | |
| 09/16/1996 | | ORDER directing appellees within 20 days from the date of this order to file a response to pet for reh/reh en banc (10 copies). (TE) | |
| 09/25/1996 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY in support of mot. for clarification of the panel's 8/22/96 ord | |
| 09/25/1996 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY to appellees' statement regarding appellants' motion to recall the August 22, 1996 mandate and to stay execution | |
| 10/07/1996 | | APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc of the panel's August 8, 1996 order. | |
| 12/02/1996 | | NOTICE OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI | |
| 12/04/1996 | | ORDER On consideration of appellants' petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the response thereto, appellants' motion for clarification of August 22, 1996, order, the opposition and reply thereto, appellants' motion to recall the August 2, 1996, mandate, the statement and the reply thereto, it is Ordered by the merits division that the petition for rehearing and the motion for clarification are denied; and it appearing that no judge has called for a vote on the en banc petition, it is Further Ordered that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied; and it further appearing that this court's order filed September 6, 1996, recalled the mandate and stayed execution pending resolution of the rehearing petition, it is Further Ordered that the motion to recall mandate is otherwise denied, the stay is lifted, and the mandate shall issue in accordance with D.C. App. R. 41. (EB) (Judge Steadman would grant the petition for rehearing. Chief Judge Wagner and Judges Ferren and Reid are recused from this case.) | |
| 01/06/1997 | | NOTICE OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI | |
| 02/24/1997 | | NOTICE OF DENIAL OF PET. FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI | |
| 02/26/1997 | | NOTICE OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI | |
| 02/27/1997 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |