| Case Information: 10-CO-0859 | |||
| Short Caption: | MICHAEL J. SINDRAM V. UNITED STATES | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal Other - Other Criminal |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | DVM971-09 | Filed Date: | 07/01/2010 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 07/01/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 11/10/2010 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | ||||||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
| Appellant | Michael J. Sindram | Y |
| |||||||||
| Appellee | United States | N |
| |||||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 07/01/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 07/29/2010 | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS nos. 09-CM-1029 and 10-CO-859 for all purposes herein. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Warren Gorman, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant in appeal no. 10-CO-859. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, in appeal no. 10-CO-859, counsel for appellatn shall immediately take the necessary steps to review the trial court record and to ensure that the transcripts necessary have been ordered and shall, within 30 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the statement regarding transcript avaiable for completion online. Where transcript(s) necessary have been rodered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting and Recording Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. (By: JAC) | |||
| 08/13/2010 | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (10CO859) (rt ordered/needed)dfe | |||
| 08/16/2010 | RECORD INDEX (10CO859) | |||
| 08/16/2010 | RECORD COPIES (10CO859) | |||
| 08/16/2010 | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to sever appeal | |||
| 08/23/2010 | ORDERED that APPELLANT SHALL W/N 20 DAYS from the date of this order, SHOW CAUSE why APPEAL NO. 10CO859 should not be dismissed for LACK OF STANDING and how he is aggrieved by the order which discharged the probation show cause against him. In Re: C.T., 724 A.2d 590 (DC 1999). It is *****MORE***** | |||
| 08/23/2010 | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's MOTION TO SEVER IS HEREBY HELD IN ABEYANCE. (BY: ETW) lw | |||
| 08/23/2010 | TMC - OTSC - motion to sever appeals (IN ABEYANCE) - ROTSC | |||
| 09/02/2010 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - dated 8/23/10 (10CO85) | |||
| 09/03/2010 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #4 (5pgs/Tape) 5/4/10 proc. | |||
| 09/03/2010 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #5 (13pgs/Tape) 5/18/10 proc. | |||
| 09/03/2010 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #6 (13pgs/Tape) 5/24/10 proc. | |||
| 09/03/2010 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #7 (11pgs/Tape) 6/29/10 proc. w/CD include | |||
| 10/20/2010 | ORDERED that appeal no. 10CO859 IS HEREBY DISMISSED for LACK OF STANDING. See In re Estate of Delaney, 819 A.2d 968, 1003 (DC 2003);...It is FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SEVER APPEAL NOS 09CM1029 and 10CO859 IS DENIED AS MOOT. It is *****MORE***** | |||
| 10/20/2010 | DISMISSED | |||
| 11/10/2010 | MANDATE ISSUED in 10-CO-859. | |||
| 04/18/2014 | Filed | Archived | ||