judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

MATTHEWS VS. STATE

Case Information: 43126
Short Caption:MATTHEWS VS. STATECourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 42065 , 42172 , 42339 , 44626 , 46338 , 46475 , 46551 , 48690 , 75549 , 75549-COA
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A471786Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Proper Person Writ Petition
Disqualifications:Maupin, ParraguirreCase Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
04/13/2004OtherDisqualification of Justice Maupin. Law firm of Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger.
04/13/2004Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
04/13/2004Petition/WritFiled Proper Person Petition for Writ. Petition for Extraordinary Relief. 04-06767
12/30/2004OtherDisqualification of Justice Parraguirre. Sat in district court proceedings.
01/12/2005Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Modification of Caption. Parties are advised to notify this office in writing within 10 days if the caption as modified does not accurately reflect the status of the parties.
02/04/2005Order/DispositionalFiled Order Denying Petition. for Writ of Mandamus. "We deny the petition." fn2[Although petitioner was not granted permission to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the documents submitted by petitioner. In light of this order we conclude that the accommodations requested by petitioner are not warranted.] SNP05-NB/RR/JH 05-02273
03/02/2005RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 05-02351
03/02/2005Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
03/10/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. to File or Submit Ex Parte Documents, Briefs, Exhibits and Complaint and Ex Parte Motion for Summary Judgment. On February 4, 2005, this court entered an order denying petitioner Felton L. Matthews's petition for a writ of mandamus. We therefore deny as moot his motion to file or submit ex parte documents, briefs, exhibits and complaint and his ex parte motion for summary judgment. fn1[Although petitioner was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from him.] 05-04783