| Case Information: 11-CV-0036 | |||
| Short Caption: | SHARITA CREEL V. LANITTA MARBURY | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB9669-10 | Filed Date: | 01/10/2011 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 01/10/2011 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 03/18/2011 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | |||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
| Appellant | Sharita Creel | Y | Pro Se | N | |
| Appellee | Lanitta Marbury | N | Pro Se | N | |
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 01/10/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 02/02/2011 | ORDERED that appellant shall w/n 20 days from the date of this order, SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for having been IMPROPERLY FILED since no final order has been designated for review... OR how appellant is aggrieved by the 1/7/11 Joint Stay Away Order wherein the parties entered into a mutual agreement to resolve the issues... (BY: ETW) | |||
| 02/02/2011 | TMC - OTSC | |||
| 02/25/2011 | ORDERED that this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of standing since appellant is not aggrieved... (FIKGST) (rm) | |||
| 02/25/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
| 03/18/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||