Case Information: 03-CV-1272 | |||
Short Caption: | PETER QUANDER V. JACK MERWIN | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Contracts |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CA5208-02 | Filed Date: | 11/14/2003 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 11/14/2003 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 02/03/2004 |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Appellant | Peter Quander | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
Appellee | Jack Merwin | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
11/14/2003 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
11/21/2003 | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |||
11/24/2003 | $50.00 DOCKETING FEE | |||
11/24/2003 | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION emergency temporary restraining order | |||
11/24/2003 | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |||
11/24/2003 | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to recuse J. John Campbell from case CA 5208-02 | |||
11/24/2003 | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |||
11/24/2003 | DESIGNATION OF RECORD | |||
11/24/2003 | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) | |||
12/17/2003 | ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, show cause why this appeal should not be dimsissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final order of the Superior Court. See West v. Morris, 711 A.2d 1269 (D.C. 1998). (by: WAGNER) | |||
12/22/2003 | APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE20 days | |||
01/06/2004 | RECEIVED Appellant's Answer/Response to court's 12/17/03 prder. | |||
01/07/2004 | TMC - December 17, 2003, order to show cause - Aplt's motion for temporary restraining order - Aplt's emergency motion to recuse - Aplt's respoense to show cause | |||
01/09/2004 | ORDEREd that this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final order. See West v. Morris, 711 A.2d 1269 (D.C. 1998). F/O that appellant's motions are DENID AS MOOT. (by: RDPYKG) | |||
01/09/2004 | DISMISSED | |||
02/03/2004 | MANDATE ISSUED |