| Case Information: 91-BG-0209 | |||
| Short Caption: | IN RE: MARK H. ZILBERBERG | Classification: | Bar Governance - Bar - Disciplinary |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | Filed Date: | 11/13/1990 | |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 11/13/1990 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | 03/05/1992 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | |||
| Party Information | ||||||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
| Petitioner | Bar Counsel | N |
| |||||||||
| Petitioner | Board on Professional Responsibility | N |
| |||||||||
| Respondent | Mark H. Zilberberg | N | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 01/01/1901 | ZILBERBERG, MARK H. IN THE MATTER OF: | |||
| 01/01/1902 | ||||
| 01/01/1903 | NOTE - 01 3/6/91 ORD: SUSPENDING RESP; NOTE - 01 RESP TO SHOW CAUSE IN 30 DAYS NOTE - 02 BEFORE THE BPR WHY IDENTICAL NOTE - 02 DSIC SHLD NOT BE IMPOSED; BPR NOTE - 03 TO RECOMMEND PROMPTLY THERAFTR NOTE - 03 TO THIS CRT WHETHER RECIPROCAL NOTE - 04 DISC SHLD BE IMPOSED OR NOTE - 04 WHETHER THEY ELECT TO PROCEED NOTE - 05 DE NOVO. NOTE - 05 | |||
| 01/01/1905 | TRDATE- 92/03/05 ACTION - MEMO ATTY 1 - ZILBERBERGM FOR - pro se ATTY 2 - HERMANE FOR - PETITIONER | |||
| 11/13/1990 | LETTER OF BAR CNSL SENDING A CERTFD COPY OF AN ORD OF THE VA STATE BAR DISC BOARD. DAS PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 03/06/1991 | ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 01-05. DAS PANELRO SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 06/05/1991 | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. RECOMMENDING TO DISBAR RESP FOR HIS MISAPPROPTN OF CLIENT FUNDS IN VA. DAS PANEL SCDATE 080191 SCHPRD DRR | |||
| 07/05/1991 | RESPONDENT'S EXCEPTIONS DAS PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/22/1991 | ORDER BRF OF RESP DUE IN 40 DAYS & BRF OF BAR COUNSEL DUE 30 DAYS THEREAFTER. DAS PANELRBH SCDATE 070591 SCHPRD CHECK | |||
| 09/11/1991 | ORDER BRF OF RESP DUE IN 10 DAYS. DAS PANELRBH SCDATE 090391 SCHPRD BR | |||
| 09/23/1991 | RESPONDENT'S BRIEF DAS PANEL SCDATE 092391 SCHPRD BR | |||
| 10/23/1991 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF BAR COUNSEL. DAS PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 02/26/1992 | PETITIONER'S MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 03/05/1992 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
| 03/05/1992 | MEMORANDUM ARGUED BEFORE JJ RG/TE/ST PANELRGTEST SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 03/05/1992 | ORDER GRANT RESPONDENT'S REQUEST TO ARGUE ON SUM CAL 3/5/92 AT 2 PM. MEH PANELROTEST SCDATE 022792 SCHPRD VS | |||
| 03/10/1992 | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION TO EXT TM TO FL POST-ARGUMENT BRF TO MARCH 30. MEH PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 03/26/1992 | ORDER Granting Bar Counsel's motion to extend time to file post-argument brief to March 30. (By Ro,Te, St) | |||
| 03/26/1992 | Grant bar counsel's motion for leave to file post-argument brief, to and including March 30, (ROTEST) | |||
| 03/30/1992 | PETITIONER'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM (Post-argument brief of Bar Counsel) | |||
| 04/06/1992 | ORDER Sua sponte directing respondent to file response w/i 15 days to Bar Counsel's post-argument memo. | |||
| 04/21/1992 | RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE To post-argument memo of bar counsel filed pursuant to 4/6/92 order of the court. | |||
| 08/04/1992 | SUSPENSION Opinion with dissenting opinion in part ordering respondent be suspended from practice of law in D.C. for three years, effective January 5, 1987. (By Ro, Te, St) | |||