Case Information: 10-CV-0980 | |||
Short Caption: | ALICE J. WALKER, ET AL V. HARRY CHOI, ET AL | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Property |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB2648-02 | Filed Date: | 08/11/2010 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 08/11/2010 | Case Status: | Decided/Dismissed |
Record Completed: | 10/06/2010 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | 03/24/2011 | ||
Argued/Submitted: | 10/06/2011 | ||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 03/07/2012 |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Appellant | Alice Walker | N |
| ||||||
Appellant | Michael D. Walker | N |
| ||||||
Appellant | Edward C. Jackson | N |
| ||||||
Appellant | Patricia A. Anthony | N |
| ||||||
Appellant | Denise Thomas | N |
| ||||||
Appellant | Ulitheda E. Grant | N |
| ||||||
Appellant | Anthony Thomas | N |
| ||||||
Appellant | Delores E. Grant | N |
| ||||||
Appellee | Harry Choi | N |
| ||||||
Appellee | Emmy Choi | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
08/11/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
08/11/2010 | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY the (trial) court's order to transfer subject property pending appeal and waiver of bond | |||
08/12/2010 | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY (AMENDED)to stay the court's order pending appeal and waiver of bond | |||
08/12/2010 | TMC - appellant's motion and amended motion to stay - opposition | |||
08/13/2010 | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's amended emergency motion to stay. | |||
08/13/2010 | On consideration of appellant's motions to stay the Aug 6, 2010 trial court order and the opposition thereto, it is O that the motions for stay are denied. FO that appellants shall w/in 30 days file with this court the SRT. (FITHNK) | |||
08/17/2010 | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (NO-RT NEEDED FOR THIS APPEAL) (elp) | |||
10/06/2010 | RECORD INDEX | |||
10/06/2010 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
10/07/2010 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellants' brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp | |||
11/18/2010 | On consideration of this court's order of October 7, 2010, directing appellantsto file the brief and the appendix within 40 days and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellants and the appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (JAC) elp | |||
11/30/2010 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and appendix to 1/17/11 - *is a holiday changed to 1/18/11 (elp) | |||
12/15/2010 | On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before January 18, 2011. (JAC) | |||
01/18/2011 | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |||
01/18/2011 | APPENDIX | |||
02/16/2011 | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 30 days (unopposed) | |||
02/17/2011 | On consideration of appellees' consent motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellees' brief shall be filed on or before March 24, 2011. (JAC) elp | |||
03/24/2011 | APPELLEES' BRIEF | |||
03/24/2011 | APPENDIX - Appellees' | |||
03/24/2011 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
05/04/2011 | ON CONSIDERATION of the NOA...and it appearing that this is an appeal from an order enforcing a settlement agreement to sale real property and the that property has subsequently been sold, it is ORDERED that APPELLANTS SHALL W/N 20 DAYS SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed AS MOOT... (BY: ETW) LW | |||
05/24/2011 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE | Referred | ||
05/25/2011 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
06/23/2011 | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY to aplt's response to show cause order. | |||
06/23/2011 | RECEIVED - aple's reponse to aplt's show cause response. | |||
06/30/2011 | ORDERED that APPELLE'S MOTION TO FILE THE LODGED REPLY IS GRANTED and the Clerk shall file the reply. It is ***MORE*** | |||
06/30/2011 | APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE - TO ROTSC | |||
06/30/2011 | FURTHER ORDERED that the issue of MOOTNESS IS HEREBY REFERRED TO THE MERITS PANEL ONCE ASSIGNED and the Clerk shall transmit the response and reply to the merits panel. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits panel as soon as the calendar permits. (BRNBKG) | |||
06/30/2011 | Filed | Final Screening - Regular - TMC | ||
07/06/2011 | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the month(s) of Sept 2011 through Nov 2011, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by July 15, 2011, of specific dates du ring that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. (Please see the attached instruction sheet.) (aj) Julio Castillo Clerk | |||
09/01/2011 | Filed | ACTION - Calendar notice sent | ||
10/06/2011 | Filed | Argued before Chief Washington, Judges Glickman and King | ||
02/14/2012 | Filed | Dismissed as Moot (MOJ) (Washington, Chief Judge, Glickman, Associate Judge, and King, Senior Judge.) | ||
03/07/2012 | Filed | Mandate |