| Case Information: 41915 | |||
| Short Caption: | MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS VS. INNOVATIVE CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A429123 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Disposition Filed/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | 09/03/2003 / Osko, Eugene | SP Status: | Completed |
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 08/15/2003 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Morse & Mowbray--check no. 9120. | ||
| 08/15/2003 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 03-13634 | |
| 08/29/2003 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: June 23, and 30, 2003. To Court Reporter: Janice Liston. | 03-14603 | |
| 08/29/2003 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 03-14604 | |
| 09/03/2003 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Eugene Osko. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
| 09/24/2003 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties have agreed to a settlement of this matter. | 03-16020 | |
| 09/24/2003 | Settlement Program Motion/Stipulation | Filed Settlement Program/Stipulated Dismissal. | 03-16021 | |
| 10/20/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On September 24, 2003, the parties to this appeal filed a stipulation to dismiss this appeal. We defer ruling on the stipulation filed on September 24, 2003. Appellants shall have 60 days from the date of this order to file in this court a copy of an order of the district court certifying that it is inclined to grant the parties' requested relief. If appellants are unable to obtain Huneycutt certification, they shall so inform this court in writing within the same time period. If appellants determine that Huneycutt is not applicable to this matter, they shall file an unconditional stipulation or motion to dismiss this appeal. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. | 03-17374 | |
| 12/19/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion to extend time to comply with Order of October 20, 2003 for Huneycutt Certification. | 03-21147 | |
| 12/30/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. filed December 19, 2003. Appellants shall have until February 17, 2004, to file in this court a copy of an order of the district court certifying that it is inclined to grant the parties' requested relief. If appellants are unable to obtain Huneycutt certification, they shall so inform this court in writing within the same time period. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. | 03-21654 | |
| 02/19/2004 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Second Motion to Extend Time to Comply with Court Orders of October 20, 2003 and December 30, 2003 for Hunneycutt Certification, or in the Alternative, Filing of Notice Mootness. | 04-03232 | |
| 03/09/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. filed February 19, 2004. Appellants shall have until June 1, 2004, to file in this court a copy of an order of the district court certifying that it is inclined to grant the parties' requested relief. If appellants are unable to obtain Huneycutt certification, they shall so inform this court in writing within the same time period. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. | 04-04447 | |
| 11/04/2004 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Stipulated Dismissal. Pursuant to the settlement conference, stipulation of the parties and cause appearing, " . . . we dismiss this appeal." The parties shall bear their own costs. NRAP 42(b). This matter is remanded to the district court to conduct appropriate proceedings, if any, to alter, amend, or vacate its order or judgment as necessary for the parties to fulfill the terms of their settlement. If the district court declines to grant the requested relief, appellant may file a motion to reinstate this appeal. fn1[In light of this order, we vacate that portion of our previous order directing appellants to comply with the provisions set forth in Huneycutt v. Huneycutt, 94 Nev. 79, 575 P.2d 585 (1978).] SNP04D-RR/WM/MD | 04-20322 | |
| 11/04/2004 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No remittitur issued. | ||