judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

CAREY (ARTHUR) VS. STATE

Case Information: 41937
Short Caption:CAREY (ARTHUR) VS. STATECourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 35787
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR991392Classification:Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:01/20/2005 at 8:30 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:01/20/2005How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
08/20/2003Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
08/20/2003Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Fast track appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Fast Track Notice mailed to all counsel.) 03-13999
09/05/2003TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: 8/1/03. Court Reporter: Isolde Zihn. 03-14948
09/10/2003Fast Track BriefFiled Fast Track Statement. 03-15181
09/10/2003AppendixFiled Appendix to Fast Track Statement. 03-15182
10/02/2003Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Fast Track Response due: October 7, 2003. 03-16369
10/03/2003Fast Track BriefFiled Fast Track Response. 03-16499
01/20/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Full Briefing. This court has concluded that full briefing of this appeal is warranted. fn1[If a party's brief will cite to documents not previously filed in this court, that party must file and serve an appropriately documented supplemental appendix with the brief.] Appellant shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve the opening brief. fn2[We note that on September 5, 2003, certified copies of the transcripts of the proceedings were filed. Should either counsel cite to transcripts not previously prepared, counsel shall file and serve a request for the necessary transcripts pursuant to NRAP 9(a). If the necessary transcripts have already been prepared and are on file in the district court, the parties may include such transcripts in the appendix without filing a transcript form.] Thereafter, briefing shall proceed as set forth in NRAP 31. fn3[On October 15, 2003, this court received a proposed proper person supplemental brief from appellant. Because appellant is represented by counsel in this appeal, this court declines to grant appellant permission to file proper person documents. The clerk of this court shall return to appellant unfilled the proper person supplemental brief received in this court on October 15, 2003. Appellant shall proceed hereafter by and through is appointed counsel.] 04-01066
01/20/2004Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to appellant Arthur Carey. Returned unfiled, the original " Appellant's Supplemental Brief received on October 15, 2003."
02/18/2004MotionFiled Stipulation and Order. Brief due: March 22, 2004. 04-03086
03/19/2004BriefFiled Opening Brief. 04-05273
04/20/2004BriefFiled Answering Brief. 04-07295
05/05/2004BriefFiled Reply Brief. 04-08219
05/05/2004Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
11/23/2004Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on January 20, 2005, at 8:30 a.m. (NNP05-WM/MD/RP)
01/04/2005Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.
01/20/2005Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. To the Northern Nevada Panel. NNP05-WM/MD/RP
04/21/2005Order/DispositionalFiled Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order of Reversal and Remand. "ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERTSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for a new trial." NNP05-WM/MD/RP 05-07788
05/17/2005RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 05-07921
05/17/2005Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
06/01/2005RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by District Court Clerk on May 18, 2005. 05-07921