judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

MACK (CHRISTOPHER) VS. STATE

Case Information: 43871
Short Caption:MACK (CHRISTOPHER) VS. STATECourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C181882Classification:Criminal Appeal - Fast Track - Direct
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
09/02/2004Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
09/02/2004Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person Fast Track. (Fast track notice mailed to trial counsel.) 04-16044
11/12/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order. To date, no fast track statement has been filed. Appellant's counsel Joseph S. Sciscento shall file and serve the fast track statement and appendix within 10 days of the date of this order or show cause why counsel for appellant should not be sanctioned. 04-20762
12/13/2004MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. Response to Order to Show Cause and Application for Extension of Time. 04-22728
12/13/2004Transcript RequestFiled Request for Rough Draft Transcript(s). Transcripts requested: 05/12/04 and 08/04/04. Court Reporter: J. Liston and Jo Anne Pierpont. Filed in district court on: 12/09/04. 04-22733
12/29/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Granting Motion in Part. This appeal was docketed on September 2, 2004, and on that same date, this court sent a notice to appellant's counsel Joseph S. Sciscento informing him that the appeal had been docketing, and in part, this court directed Sciscento to file the fast track statement on or before October 12, 2004. Because no fast track statement was filed, on November 12, 2004, this court ordered Sciscento to file the fast track statement by November 22, 2004, or show cause why Sciscento should not be sanctioned. On December 13, 2004, Sciscento filed a response to this court's order. fn1[A proposed fast track statement and appendix were attached to the response. The fast track statement is merely the form for a fast track statement, and the only information provided is the name of the appellant. The clerk of this court shall return, unfiled the fast track statement and appendix received on December 13, 2004.] This court concludes that appellant has not demonstrated extreme need or merit. Nonetheless, the motion is granted in part. Counsel for appellant shall have 40 days from the date of this order within which to file and serve the fast track statement and appendix. 04-23679
12/29/2004Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to attorney Joseph S. Sciscento. Returned unfiled, the "Fast Track Statement and Appellant's Fast Track Appendix that were attached to the response filed on December 13, 2004."
01/18/2005TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: May 12, 2004 and August 4, 2004. Court Reporter: Kanice Liston and Jo Anne B. Pierpont. 05-01110
02/14/2005MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 05-02912
02/17/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. filed February 14, 2005. The clerk of this court shall file, forthwith, the fast track statement and appendix provisionally submitted on February 14, 2005. 05-03183
02/17/2005Fast Track BriefFiled Fast Track Statement. 05-02913
02/17/2005AppendixFiled Appendix to Fast Track Statement. 05-02914
03/07/2005Fast Track BriefFiled Fast Track Response. 05-04389
04/19/2005Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED." SNP05-RR/MG/JH 05-07531
05/17/2005RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 05-07764
05/17/2005Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
06/01/2005RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on May 19, 2005. 05-07764