judyrecords
search tips
770 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

YOUNG VS. DIST. CT. (MCKAY)

Case Information: 43973
Short Caption:YOUNG VS. DIST. CT. (MCKAY)Court:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A460332Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

Party Information
RoleParty NameRepresented By
PetitionerA.B.X., Inc.Anthony L. Ashby (Ashby & Ranalli)
PetitionerAero ExpressAnthony L. Ashby (Ashby & Ranalli)
PetitionerAirborne Express, Inc.Anthony L. Ashby (Ashby & Ranalli)
PetitionerAirborne Freight, Inc.Anthony L. Ashby (Ashby & Ranalli)
PetitionerG.F. Trucking, Inc.Anthony L. Ashby (Ashby & Ranalli)
PetitionerTracy YoungAnthony L. Ashby (Ashby & Ranalli)
Real Party in InterestArapata McKayRobert T. Eglet (Mainor Eglet Cottle, LLP)
Real Party in InterestJulie McKayRobert T. Eglet (Mainor Eglet Cottle, LLP)
RespondentThe Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark
RespondentThe Honorable Jennifer Togliatti, District Judge

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
09/21/2004Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Ashby & Ranalli, LLP--check no. 5066.
09/21/2004Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 04-17452
09/21/2004AppendixFiled Appendix, Volume 1. 04-17454
09/21/2004AppendixFiled Appendix, Volume 2. 04-23859
09/21/2004AppendixFiled Appendix, Volume 3. 04-23860
09/21/2004AppendixFiled Appendix, Volume 4. 04-23861
09/21/2004AppendixFiled Appendix, Volume 5. 04-23862
09/21/2004Notice/OutgoingFiled Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Affidavit. Due Date: 10 days
09/24/2004Order/DispositionalFiled Order Denying Petition. Petition for Writ of Mandamus. "We deny the petition." SNP04S-MS/RR/MD 04-17720
09/27/2004MotionFiled Motion. Respondents' Request this Court not Entertain Petitioners' Improper Writ of Mandate. 04-17842
10/01/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. On September 24, 2004, we denied this original petition for a writ of mandamus. We therefore deny as moot respondents' motion requesting that we not entertain the petition. 04-18192
10/19/2004RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 04-17940
10/19/2004Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.