| Case Information: 43969 | |||
| Short Caption: | DESTEFANO VS. BERKUS | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 43851 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A489970 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | En Banc | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 09/20/2004 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Harold P. Gewerter, Esq., Ltd.--check no. 3459. | ||
| 09/20/2004 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 04-17367 | |
| 10/01/2004 | Motion | Filed Motion for Stay. Appellant's Emergency Motion to Stay Order Pending Appeal; Request for Order Shortening Time. | 04-18172 | |
| 10/01/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Destefano shall have 20 days from the date of this order within which to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot. Respondent may file any reply within 10 days from the date that Destefano's response is served. fn3[We defer ruling on Destefano's October 1, 2004 motion for stay, pending our receipt of his response to this show cause order.] | 04-18200 | |
| 10/04/2004 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 04-18256 | |
| 10/20/2004 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Appellant Mark Destefano's Response to Order to Show Cause. | 04-19374 | |
| 11/02/2004 | Motion | Filed Reply to Response. Respondents' Points and Authorities Regarding the Court's Order to Show Cause. | 04-20172 | |
| 11/08/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Allowing Appeal to Proceed. Our preliminary review of this appeal revealed that this appeal be moot. Accordingly, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should be dismissed as moot. Appellant's response to our show cause order indicates that he is challenging the validity of NRS 281.050, and he is not arguing that his name should be placed back on the general election ballot, we conclude that this appeal is not moot. We allow this appeal to proceed. Appellant shall have 15 days from the date of this order to comply with NRAP 9(a), and 120 days to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). fn3[We deny appellant's October 2004 motion for stay.] | 04-20490 | |
| 11/19/2004 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: August 17, 2004, August 26, 2004, September 7, 2004 and October 12, 2004. To Court Reporter: Sonia L. Riley. | 04-21376 | |
| 12/08/2004 | Transcript | Filed Transcript. Proceedings: 9/7/04. Court Reporter: Sonia L. Riley. | 04-22432 | |
| 12/08/2004 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from Court Reporter Sonia Riley. Transcripts were not recorded for 8/17/04, 8/26/04, and 10/12/04. | 04-22433 | |
| 03/08/2005 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. | 05-04569 | |
| 03/08/2005 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Opening Brief. | 05-04571 | |
| 04/08/2005 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. | 05-06935 | |
| 05/06/2005 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. | 05-08913 | |
| 09/22/2005 | Opinion/Dispositional | Filed Per Curiam Opinion. "Affirmed." fn1[We have determined that oral argument is not warranted in this case.] Before the Court EN BANC. Author: Per Curiam. Majority: Becker, C.J., Rose, Maupin, Gibbons, Douglas, Hardesty, and Parraguirre, JJ. 121 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 62. EN BANC. | 05-18807 | |
| 10/18/2005 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 05-19225 | |
| 10/18/2005 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 10/26/2005 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on October 20, 2005. | 05-19225 | |