| Case Information: 41741 | |||
| Short Caption: | BEARD-QUIMBY VS. BEARD | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 37342 , 37688 , 38627 , 38628 , 38895 , 40844 , 42004 , 44979 , 45840 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D253090 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Child Custody/Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 09/10/2003 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 07/14/2003 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 07/14/2003 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 03-11802 | |
| 07/23/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due in District Court Case No. D253090: 60 days. fn2[See NRAP 11(a)(2) (providing that the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings.)] The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court. | 03-12494 | |
| 09/10/2003 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal Copy. Vols. 1 through 6. | 03-15167 | |
| 09/10/2003 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 10/15/2004 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. In both appeals docketed in this court, appellant seeks to appeal from the same district court ordered entered on remand in February 2002. This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeals from that order. In either instance, appellant's attempt s to appeal from the February 2002 were untimely. We dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 42004. We dismiss the portion of the appeal in Docket No. 41741 that purports to challenge the February order. As for the appeal from the June 13, 2003 order finding appellant in contempt, this court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal from a contempt order. This court lacks jurisdiction to consider appellant's appeal from the June 13 order, and 'We dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 41741.' fn5[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered appellant's proper person documents, and we conclude that the relief requested therein is moot in light of this order.] SNP04D-RR/WM/MD. Nos. 41741/42004 - cases are not consolidated. | 04-19143 | |
| 11/09/2004 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 04-19642 | |
| 11/09/2004 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 12/01/2004 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on November 12, 2004. | 04-19642 | |