judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

STATE VS. CHEWJALEARN (CHINNAPONG)

Case Information: 43667
Short Caption:STATE VS. CHEWJALEARN (CHINNAPONG)Court:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR021572Classification:Criminal Appeal - Fast Track - Pretrial
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
07/27/2004Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
07/27/2004Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Fast track appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Fast Track Notice mailed to all counsel.)
08/02/2004Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request.
08/17/2004Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Cross-Appeal. (fast track notice mailed to all counsel)
08/31/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Show Cause. Respondent's counsel shall have 20 days from the date of this order to show cause why the cross-appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
09/01/2004Fast Track BriefFiled Fast Track Statement. (appellant/cross-respondent)
09/01/2004AppendixFiled Appendix to Fast Track Statement. (appellant/cross-respondent)
09/16/2004MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause.
09/20/2004Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Fast Track Response due from respondent/cross-appellant: September 28, 2004.
09/28/2004Fast Track BriefFiled Fast Track Statement. Respondent/Cross-Appellant. STRICKEN BY ORDER 10/07/04.
09/29/2004Fast Track BriefFiled Fast Track Response. Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
10/07/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Case Processing Order. On August 17,2 004, respondent filed a notice of appeal/cross-appeal. On August 31, 2004, this court ordered respondent's counsel to show cause why this cross-appeal should not be dismissed. Respondent filed a response on September 16, 2004. To the extent that respondent is attempting to cross-appeal from that portion of the district court's order denying his motion to dismiss, such an order is not appealable. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to entertain the cross-appeal, and we "ORDER this cross-appeal DISMISSED." fn2[The clerk of this court shall strike, forthwith, the fast track statement filed by respondent/cross-appellant on September 28, 2004.]
01/06/2005Notice/OutgoingFiled Notice of Modification of Caption. Parties are advised to notify this office in writing within 10 days if the caption as modified does not accurately reflect the status of the parties.
03/03/2005Order/DispositionalFiled Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order Reversing in Part and Remanding. "ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED IN PART AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order." fn11[The State asks, in the event that this court reverses in part the district court's order, that we remand the case to a different district court judge. The State has not provided this court with any compelling reason or legal authority in support of its argument; accordingly, this case is remanded to the same district court as a matter of course.] SNP05-RR/MG/JH
03/29/2005RemittiturFiled Remittitur.
03/29/2005Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
04/07/2005RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by District Court Clerk on April 1, 2005.
09/09/2014Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order. Filed in district court on: September 5, 2014.
09/12/2014Notice/OutgoingIssued letter regarding sealing of records.