search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record


Case Information: 47518
Short Caption:LAS VEGAS METRO. POLICE DEP'T VS. THOMASCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 50712
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A501544Classification:Civil Appeal - Administrative Agency - General
Disqualifications:Case Status:Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:06/23/2006 / England, KathleenSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
06/16/2006Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived. Returned check no. 080734 to Marquis & Aurbach.
06/16/2006Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 06-12668
06/23/2006Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Kathleen L. England. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
06/28/2006Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 06-13333
07/24/2006Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Not Appropriate for Settlement Program. 06-15331
10/19/2006Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Appropriate for Settlement Program. This case is not appropriate for mediation and should be removed from the settlement conference program. 06-21529
10/23/2006Settlement Order/Procedural Order Removing From Settlement Program/Briefing Reinstated. and Reinstating Briefing. Pursuant to the recommendation of the settlement judge and good cause appearing, this appeal is removed from the settlement conference program. We reinstate the deadlines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 90 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). 06-21766
10/30/2006Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. 06-22064
12/18/2006BriefFiled Opening Brief. 06-25850
12/18/2006AppendixFiled Joint Appendix. Vols. 1 and 2. 06-25852
12/20/2006MotionFiled Motion. to Withdraw as Counsel for Respondent Cynthia Thomas and Motion for Enlargement of Time in Which to File Answering Brief. 06-26103
12/21/2006Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. for Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Respondent Cynthia Thomas and Motion for Enlargement of Time in Which to File Answering Brief. 06-26175
12/30/2006Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. to Withdraw as Counsel. The clerk shall remove Mr. Gewerter as counsel for respondent in this appeal. Respondent shall have 30 days to obtain counsel and cause counsel to enter an appearance in this court or to in form this court in writing that respondent will not be retaining new counsel. The briefing schedule shall be suspended pending respondent's response to this order. We deny respondent's motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief as moot. 06-26740
01/31/2007Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance. Representing respondent: Shook & Stone, and Leonard H. Stone. 07-02534
04/12/2007MotionFiled Motion. Motion to Reinstate Briefing Schedule. 07-08249
05/07/2007Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Briefing Reinstated. 07-10059
05/07/2007Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Briefing Reinstated. Attorney Leonard H. Stone has entered a notice of appearance on behalf of respondent. We grant appellant's motion and reinstate briefing in this appeal. Answering brief due: 30 days. Appellant shall have 30 days from service of the answering brief to file and serve the reply brief. 07-10059
06/06/2007BriefFiled Answering Brief. 07-12359
07/10/2007BriefFiled Reply Brief. 07-15003
08/07/2007Order/ProceduralFiled Order. to Show Cause. Response due; 15 days. 07-17363
08/22/2007MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. and Alternatively, Request to Construe Appeal as Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 07-18621
09/04/2007MotionFiled Reply to Response. Respondent's Reply to Appellant's Response to Order to Show Cause, and Response to Appellant's Requst to Consider Appeal as Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 07-19394
10/12/2007Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. "ORDER this appeal DISMISSED." Fn7 [We decline appellant's request to convert this appeal into a writ proceeding. . . .Respondent's request for attorney fees and costs is denied.] NNP08G-MG/MC/NS 07-22572
10/31/2007Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived. Returned rehearing fee (check no. 087498) to Marquis & Aurbach.
10/31/2007Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Rehearing. Appellant's Petition for Rehearing. 07-23894
12/04/2007Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NRAP 40(c). Fn1 [We note that, while our October 12, 2007 order dismissing this appeal suggests that extraordinary writ relief would be unavailable because a petition to the district court for judicial review of any adverse EMRB decision would appear to constitute an adequate and speedy legal remedy, nothing in that order prevents appellant from filing a separate petition for extraordinary relief demonstrating why this court's intervention at this time appropriate.] 07-26182
12/17/2007Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. Appellant's Petition. 07-27245
01/02/2008RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 08-00075
01/02/2008Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/En Banc Reconsideration Pending.
01/14/2008RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on January 4, 2008. 08-00075
02/21/2008Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. Having considered the petition on file herein, we have concluded that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. Accordingly, we "ORDER the petition DENIED." EN BANC. Fn1 [NRAP 40A]. 08-04194