search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record


Case Information: 41656
Short Caption:IKEUCHI (HALINA) VS. DISTRICT COURTCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C189413Classification:Original Proceeding - Criminal - Certiorari/Prohibition
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
06/30/2003Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
06/30/2003Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. Petition for Writ of Prohibition or, in the Alternative, Mandamus. 03-10881
07/01/2003Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Affidavit. Due Date: 10 days
07/07/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. The real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 15 days from the date of this order within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. 03-11250
07/08/2003Notice/IncomingFiled Affidavit. Affidavit and Verification in Support of Writ of Prohibition or, in the Alternative, Mandamus. 03-11448
07/11/2003Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. (Affidavit). 03-11668
09/09/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Show Cause. On July 7, 2003, this court entered an order directing the State, on behalf of the respondent, to file an answer to the petition on or before July 22, 2003. To date, the State has not complied with that order. The State shall have 15 days from the date of this order to file and serve an answer to the petition or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed on counsel for the State. 03-15108
09/24/2003Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Writ. 03-15985
11/06/2003Order/DispositionalFiled Order Granting Petition. In light of the State's response, " . . . we grant this petition in part." The clerk of this court shall issue a writ of mandamus instructing the district court to reconsider its order directing the forced medication of petitioner and reevaluate the request to forcible medicate petitioner in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Sell, as well as its related decisions in Riggins v. Nevada 504 U.S. 127 (1992) and Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990). NNP04S-NB/MS/MG 03-18505
11/06/2003WritIssued Writ. Original and one copy of writ and copy of order mailed to Thomas W. Rigsby for service upon Judge John S. McGroarty. 03-18553
12/02/2003RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 03-18599
12/02/2003Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
03/19/2004WritFiled Writ. Served on Judge John S. McGroarty on March 15th, 2004. 03-18553