judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

DIV. OF CHILD AND FAMILY SVCS. VS. DIST. CT. (DANIEL M., A MINOR)

Case Information: 43581
Short Caption:DIV. OF CHILD AND FAMILY SVCS. VS. DIST. CT. (DANIEL M., A MINOR)Court:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - J63469Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus/Prohibition
Disqualifications:Case Status:Disposition Filed/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
07/12/2004Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
07/12/2004Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. Petition for Writ of Prohibition or in the Alternative Mandamus and Stay of District Court Proceedings. 04-12676
07/15/2004Petition/WritFiled Supplement to Petition for Writ. 04-12918
07/15/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. Order Granting Temporary Stay and Directing Stay. The real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. Petitioners have requested a stay pending consideration of the petition. We conclude that a temporary stay is warranted, pending receipt and consideration of any opposition to the requested say. We stay enforcement of the district court's contempt order. 04-12936
07/23/2004MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Petition. Request to Withdraw Petition for Writ of Prohibition or in the Alternative Mandamus and Stay the District Court Proceedings. 04-13476
08/27/2004Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Petition. Order Dismissing Petition for Writ of Prohibition or Mandamus. Petitioners have filed a motion to voluntarily withdraw their petition, based on the district court's order vacating its contempt order and because this court's recent opinion in State, Division of Child & Family Services v. District Court resolved the legal issues presented by this petition. We therefore grant the motion and " . . . dismiss the petition." fn2[See NRAP 42. The parties shall bear their own costs and fees, if any.] In light of this order, we vacate our July 15, 2004 order imposing a stay and directing an answer. SNP04D-RR/WM/MD 04-15565
08/27/2004Case Status Update Case Closed. No notice in lieu of remittitur issued.