judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

ZHANG VS. DIST. CT. (SORICHETTI)

Case Information: 43601
Short Caption:ZHANG VS. DIST. CT. (SORICHETTI)Court:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 52326 , 52835 , 58602 , 69246 , 70923
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A481513Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus/Prohibition
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
07/15/2004Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Marquis & Aurbach--check no. 070874.
07/15/2004Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. 04-12873
07/15/2004AppendixFiled Appendix. 04-12874
07/15/2004MotionFiled Motion for Stay. Emergency Motion for Stay pending Resolution of Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition. 04-12875
07/19/2004MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Emergency Motion for Stay. 04-13107
08/03/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. Order Granting Motion for Stay and Directing Answer. Petitioner has filed an emergency motion for a stay of the expungement order, to which the real party in interest has filed an opposition. In deciding whether to issue a stay, this court considers four factors. We grant petitioner's motion and we stay the expungement order, as well as the remaining procedures in District Court Case No. A481513 pending further order of this court. fn2[We deny the real party in interest's request that a bond be posted for the stay. See NRAP 8(b).] The real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 20 days from this order's date to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writs. 04-14056
08/13/2004Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Writ. Opposition to Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition. 04-14699
08/25/2004Other Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, with letter (pursuant to NRAP 27(a)), Reply in Support of Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition.
08/30/2004MotionFiled Motion for Permission to File Document. Motion to File a Reply in Support of Petition for Writs of Prohibition and Mandamus. 04-15709
08/30/2004MotionReceived Reply to Response. Reply in Support of Petition for Writs of Prohibition and Mandamus. 04-15714
09/03/2004MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion to File a Reply in Support of Petition for Writs of Prohibition and Mandamus. 04-16085
12/29/2004Opinion/DispositionalFiled Per Curiam Opinion. "Petition granted in part." fn2[Petitioner's motion for leave to file a reply in support of the petition is granted. The clerk of this court shall file the reply provisionally received on August 30, 2004.] We instruct the clerk of this court to issue a writ of mandamus. fn24[In light of this opinion, we vacate our stay.] To the extent that Zhang also requests a writ of prohibition barring the district court "from determining factual issues such as novation" until after discovery and a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to grant leave to amend the complaint, our issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the district court to reinstate Zhang's complaint renders these requests moot.] Before Rose, Maupin and Douglas, JJ. Author: Per Curiam.120 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 104. SNP04D 04-23607
12/29/2004MotionFiled Reply to Response. Reply in Support of Petition for Writs of Prohibition and Mandamus. 04-15714
12/29/2004WritIssued Writ. Original and one copy of writ and copy of opinion mailed to Scott A. Marquis for service upon Judge Adair. 04-23611
01/11/2005WritFiled Writ. Served on Judge Valerie Adair on January 5, 2005. 04-23611
01/25/2005RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 05-00924
01/25/2005Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.