judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

MURPHY VS. MURPHY (CHILD CUSTODY)

Case Information: 47466
Short Caption:MURPHY VS. MURPHY (CHILD CUSTODY)Court:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 48652 , 53871
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D324799Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Fast Track Child Custody
Disqualifications:Case Status:Disposition Filed/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:08/09/2006 / Worrell, CarolynSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
06/09/2006Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
06/09/2006MotionFiled Motion for Stay. Motion for Emergency Stay of all Future Hearings in the Above Entitled Matter pending Appeal. (Filed via fax.) 06-12176
06/09/2006Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. for a Stay. In determining whether to issue a stay in cases involving child custody, this court considers four factors. We are not persuaded that a stay is warranted at this time. We deny appellant's motions. Nos. 47466/47468 - cases are not consolidated. 06-12208
06/13/2006Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from David C. Amesbury, Inc.--check no. 4930.
06/13/2006Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Child Custody Fast Track Notice mailed to all counsel.) 06-12319
06/16/2006Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Show Cause. Appellant shall have 15 days from the date of this order within which to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We suspend the briefing schedule and any transcript preparation, as provided under the Child Custody Fast Track Rule, pending further order of this court. 06-12678
07/03/2006MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. Appellant's Response to Supreme Court Order to Show Cause filed June 16, 2006. 06-13688
08/04/2006Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Assigning Appeal to Settlement Conference Program. The April 20, 2006 order establishes the custody arrangement and is an appealable order. Since this court has jurisdiction to consider this appeal, we conclude that assignment to the NRAP 16 settlement program is appropriate. The clerk shall issue a notice assigning this appeal to the settlement conference program. Briefing and the time for requesting transcripts shall remain suspended pending further order of this court. 06-16246
08/09/2006Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Carolyn Worrell. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
08/28/2006Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. Courtesy copy of letter from Thomas J. Gibson addressed to David C. Amesbury requesting that a motion to dismiss be filed in this appeal. 06-17832
09/07/2006Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Appropriate for Settlement Program. This case is appropriate for mediation and a settlement conference will be scheduled. 06-18534
11/17/2006Settlement Program ReportFiled Final Report/Settlement. The parties have agreed to a settlement of this matter. 06-23657
01/25/2007Order/ProceduralFiled Order. The settlement judge has filed a report stating that the parties had reached an agreement. As of the date of this order, no stipulation has been filed. Appellant shall file a stipulation or motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal, or otherwise inform this court of the status of this appeal within 30 days. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. 07-02027
02/08/2007MotionFiled Stipulation/Dismiss Appeal. Stipulation Withdrawing Appeal. 07-03233
07/10/2007Order/DispositionalFiled Stipulated Dismissal. Pursuant to the settlement conference, the stipulation of the parties and cause appearing, " . . . this appeal is dismissed." NRAP 42(b). 07-15027
07/10/2007Case Status Update Case Closed. No remittitur issued.