| Case Information: 91-AA-0845 | |||
| Short Caption: | CAFRITZ COMPANY V. D.C. RENTAL HOUSING COMMISSION | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Rental Housing Commission |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | Filed Date: | 07/26/1991 | |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 07/26/1991 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 09/20/1991 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | 12/19/1991 | ||
| Argued/Submitted: | 09/04/1992 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 10/09/1996 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Amicus-Petitioner | Washington Association of Realtors | N |
| ||||||
| Petitioner | Cafritz Company | N |
| ||||||
| Respondent | District of Columbia | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 01/01/1901 | CAFRITZ COMPANY D.C. RENTAL HOUSING COMMISSION | |||
| 01/01/1902 | ||||
| 01/01/1903 | NOTE - 01 12/17/91 ORD: MO OF PETNR NOTE - 01 CAFRITZ COMPANY TO CONSOLIDATE NOTE - 02 & TO INTERVENE ON BEHALF OF NOTE - 02 PETITIONER JOSEPH ROGERS GRNTD NOTE - 03 F/O RESPT MO TO CONSIDER RECRD NOTE - 03 FLD IN 91-845 AS RECORD IN NOTE - 04 91-859 GRNTD. MO X TM FL LODGD NOTE - 04 BRF IN 91-845 GRNTD. F/O PETNR NOTE - 05 BRF IN 90-859 TO BE FLD W/IN NOTE - 05 40 DYS FRM DT OF ORDER. NOTE - 06 CONS: 91-859 NOTE - 06 | |||
| 01/01/1906 | LUCHSR THE WASH. ASSOC. OF REALTORS | |||
| 07/26/1991 | PETITIONER'S DOCKETING STATEMENT AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/26/1991 | $50.00 DOCKETING FEE AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/26/1991 | PETITION FOR REVIEW AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/26/1991 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
| 07/29/1991 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD & TO CHARLES L. REISCHEL AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 08/20/1991 | RESP MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE THE RECORD FOR 10 EXTRA DAYS AJ PANEL SCDATE 081491 SCHPRD R | |||
| 09/11/1991 | RECEIVED RECORD ON APPEAL (MXRE STILL PENDING) RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 09/20/1991 | ORDER RESP MO X TM FL LODGED RECORD GRNTD. F/O PETNR BRF DUE W/IN 40 DYS FRM DT OF ORDER. GR PANELRBH SCDATE 090991 SCHPRD GR | |||
| 09/20/1991 | RECORD ON APPEAL GR PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 09/20/1991 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 10/02/1991 | AMICUS CURIAE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF WASHINGTON, ASSO. OF REALTORS, ET AL WITH CONSENT LTR ATTACHED PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 10/09/1991 | ORDER GR MO OF AMICI CURIAE (DC ASOC OF REALTOR ETC..)TO FL BRF IN 40 DAYS. AD PANELRO SCDATE 100391 SCHPRD K | |||
| 10/23/1991 | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF APLE IN 91-859 TO CONSIDER REC. IN THIS APPEAL THE REC. IN 91-859 RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 10/30/1991 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE WITH 91-859 PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 10/30/1991 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF ADDITIONAL 15 DAYS (NO OPPO) AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 10/30/1991 | MOTION(S) FEE PAID PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 11/14/1991 | AMICUS CURIAE'S BRIEF AJ PANEL SCDATE 111891 SCHPRD BAC | |||
| 11/14/1991 | RECEIVED APLT BRIEF PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 12/17/1991 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF CAFRITZ COMPANY GR PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 12/17/1991 | ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 01 - 06 GR PANELJWR SCDATE 112791 SCHPRD GR | |||
| 12/19/1991 | MEMORANDUM OF APLE IN LIEU OF BRIEF PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 12/19/1991 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
| 01/24/1992 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF JOSEPH ROGERS AJ PANEL SCDATE 012792 SCHPRD BA | |||
| 03/11/1992 | PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF JOSEPH ROGERS - PRO SE PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 09/04/1992 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
| 09/04/1992 | ARGUED (TE SC KG) John J. Brennan III, Esq. for Cafritz; Richard W. Luchs, Esq., amicus curiae; Joseph Rogers, pro se. | |||
| 10/16/1992 | ORDER, sua sponte, that on page 14 of the court's opinion issued 10/16/92, the first sentence of the first full paragraph shall be changed to read as follows: The unmistakeable import of the statutory provisions cited above, and the regulations promulgated by the Commission pursuant to those provisions, is that the Rent Administrator is empowered to authorize the landlord to implement the rent increase once the improvements are completed. (TESCKG) printed @ p.2966-A | |||
| 10/27/1992 | ORDER, sua sponte, that on page 14 of the court's opinion issued 10/16/92, the first sentence of the first full paragraph shall be changed to read as follows: The unmistakeable import of the statutory provisions cited above, and the regulations promulgated by the Commission pursuant to those provisions, is that the Rent Administrator is empowered to authorize the landlord to implement the rent increase once the improvements are completed. (TESCKG) printed @ p.2966-A | |||
| 10/09/1996 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||