| Case Information: 11-AA-0538 | |||
| Short Caption: | VERDOVA G. BISHOP V. DC DEP'T OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | DOES00149-10 | Filed Date: | 05/02/2011 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 05/02/2011 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 07/14/2011 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Petitioner | Verdova G. Bishop | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Respondent | D.C. Department of Employment Services - Unemployment | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 05/02/2011 | PETITION FOR REVIEW (RECVD ONLY) | |||
| 05/02/2011 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
| 05/02/2011 | RECEIVED Petitioner's Motion to Consolidate this appeal with 10-AA-250 (Mpifp pend). | |||
| 05/11/2011 | RECEIVED - Respondent's Opposition to Motion to Consolidate | |||
| 05/25/2011 | ORDERED that the MOTION TO PROCEED IFP IS DENIED and PETITIONER IS DIRECTED TO TENDER the $100 FILING FEE W/N 20 DAYS...Failure to comply shall subject this petition to dismissal without further notice. It is ****MORE**** | |||
| 05/25/2011 | FURTHER ORDERED that PETITIONER SHALL W/N 20 DAYS SHOW CAUSE why this petition should not be dismissed for having been IMPROPERLY FILED since an appealable odrer has not been identified. It is FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall w/n 20 days SHOW CAUSE to the extent that petitioner seeks review of the Final Order entered 5/2/10, why this petition should not be dismissed either for having been UNTIMELY FILED or for LACK OF STANDING... SEE HARDCOPY ***MORE**** | |||
| 05/25/2011 | FURTHER ORDERED that the LODGED PFR, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE and the OPPOSITION are HELD IN ABEYANCE. (BY: ETW) LW | |||
| 06/07/2011 | RECEIVED - pet's oppo to motion to consolidate (returned for copies) | |||
| 06/08/2011 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE | |||
| 06/22/2011 | ON FURTHER CONSIDERATION of this court's MAY 25, 2011 order...the response thereto, wherein petioner concedes that the May 2, 2010 order indicated on the PFR DOES NOT EXIST and petitioner's motion to consolidate w/APPEAL 10AA250 and the opposition thereto, and it apearing that PETITIONER FAILED TO TENDER THE REQUIRED FEE, it is ORDERED that this PFR IS STRICKEN AND DISMISSED. See DC App R. 13: Vines v. Manufacturers Traders Trust Co... It is FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE IS DENIED AS MOOT. (BY: ETW) LW | |||
| 06/22/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
| 07/14/2011 | Filed | Mandate | ||