Log In
judyrecords
search tips
770 million+
United States Court Cases

California Fifth Appellate District Record

Sklarski v. Rarig Construction, Inc.

Parties and Attorneys

Sklarski v. Rarig Construction, Inc.
Case Number F072515
Party Attorney
Richard Sklarski : Plaintiff and Appellant
David Michael Cumberland
Adamski Moroski Madden et al LLP
PO Box 3835
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403

Michelle Landis Gearhart
Adamski Moroski Madden Cumberland Green
PO Box 3853
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403

Rarig Construction, Inc. : Defendant and Respondent
Jeffrey Mark Soll
Goldman, Magdalin, & Krikes, LLP
6300 Canoga Ave Ste 1400
Woodland Hills, CA 91367



Case Summary

Trial Court Case:
14C0196
Court of Appeal Case:
F072515
Division:
Case Caption:
Sklarski v. Rarig Construction, Inc.
Case Type:
CV
Filing Date:
10/05/2015
Completion Date:
02/29/2016
Oral Argument Date/Time:


Docket (Register of Actions)

Sklarski v. Rarig Construction, Inc.
Case Number F072515
Date Description Notes
10/20/2015 Notice of appeal lodged/received. Atty Cumberland obo Sklarski; appeals 6/24/15 order re: dismissal of Rarig Construction, etc.
10/20/2015 Filing fee. $775 rec'd obo appellant Sklarski
10/20/2015 Letter sent to counsel re: Mediation screening questionnaire
cc: superior court
10/20/2015 Notice per rule 8.124 - with reporter's transcript. filed 10/14/15 by atty Cumberland obo appellant Sklarski
10/22/2015 Civil case information statement filed. Atty Gearhart obo applt
10/22/2015 Request filed to: Respondent's Rarig Construction's Petition to Dismiss Due to Untimely Notice of Appeal Under CA Rule of Court Rule 8.104 from atty Soll; holding 15 days for possible opposition
10/28/2015 Respondent's Questionnaire received. atty Soll obo resp Rarig Construction
11/05/2015 Appellant's Questionnaire received. atty Gearhart
11/06/2015 Opposition filed. Filed to Respondent Rarig Construction, Inc.'s Petition to Dismiss from Atty Gearhart obo applt Sklarski
11/06/2015 To court. Respondent's Rarig Construction's Petition to Dismiss Due to Untimely Notice of Appeal Under CA Rule of Court Rule 8.104 filed 10/22/15 from atty Soll AND Applt's Opposition filed on 11/6/15
11/13/2015 Order filed. Respondent's "PETITION TO DISMISS &" filed on October 22, 2015, is denied as appellant's notice of appeal was timely filed. (Silverbrand v. County of Los Angeles (2009) 46 Cal.4th 106, 111-112, fn. 3; Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.60, 8.104(a)(1)(B); Code Civ. Proc., ยงยง 10, 12, 12a(a).)
11/16/2015 Letter sent to: Parties and Superior Court re: The Court has determined that the above entitled appeal is not suitable for mediation.

Pursuant to Court of Appeal, Fifth District, Local Rules, rule 2 (Mediation in Civil Appeals), the suspension of the operation of California Rules of Court, rules 8.121, 8.124, and 8.216 requiring designation of the record on appeal, payment of the estimated costs of preparation of the record on appeal, and submission of a proposed briefing schedule is terminated as of this date. You are directed to comply immediately with the applicable California Rules of Court as if the notice of appeal was filed as of the date of this letter. (JAH)
01/14/2016 Telephone conversation with: Atty Gearhart Assistant informing the court that an agreement has been reached and a dismissal will be filed in Superior Court.
01/29/2016 Abandonment of appeal filed in trial court. by Atty Cumberland obo Applt Sklarski.
01/29/2016 Dismissal order filed.
02/29/2016 Remittitur issued.
02/29/2016 Case complete.


Briefs

Sklarski v. Rarig Construction, Inc.
Case Number F072515

No information found.



Disposition

Sklarski v. Rarig Construction, Inc.
Case Number F072515
Description:
Abandonment of appeal filed in trial court
Date:
01/29/2016
Disposition Type:
Final
Publication Status:
Author:
Participants:
Case Citation:
none


Trial Court

Sklarski v. Rarig Construction, Inc.
Case Number F072515
Trial Court Name:
Kings County Superior Court - Main
County:
Kings
Trial Court Case Number:
14C0196
Trial Court Judge:
LaPorte, James
Trial Court Judgment Date:
06/24/2015