| Case Information: 11-FM-0611 | |||
| Short Caption: | GERALD HENNEGHAN V. GODFREY HENNEGHAN | Classification: | Appeals - Family - Custody |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | DRB2000-10 | Filed Date: | 05/09/2011 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 05/09/2011 | Case Status: | Decided/Dismissed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 09/13/2011 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | |||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
| Appellant | Gerald Henneghan | Y | Pro Se | N | |
| Appellee | Godrey Henneghan | N | Pro Se | N | |
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 05/09/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 05/31/2011 | ORDERED that APPELLANT SHALL W/N 20 DAYS SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for having been taken from a NON-FINAL ORDER... It is FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLANTS' RESPONSE should also include an explanation of how Due Process (federal question) is the basis for establishing jurisdiction for this appeal. (BY: ETW) LW | |||
| 05/31/2011 | TMC - OTSC | |||
| 08/19/2011 | Filed | Order Sua Sponte Dismissing Appeal | ||
| 08/19/2011 | Filed | Dismissed | ||
| 09/13/2011 | Filed | Mandate | ||