judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

PADILLA-SALDANA (ELOY) VS. STATE

Case Information: 38468
Short Caption:PADILLA-SALDANA (ELOY) VS. STATECourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 52011 , 62762 , 67498 , 67606 , 75237 , 75237-COA , 80066
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR953157Classification:Criminal Appeal - Life - Post-Conviction
Disqualifications:Case Status:Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:09/11/2002How Submitted:On Briefs

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
09/12/2001Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
09/12/2001Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 01-15461
09/18/2001Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 01-15796
11/09/2001MotionFiled Motion and Order/Excess Pages. Granted: 44 pages. 01-18764
11/13/2001BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: Reno/Carson Msgr. 11/13/01. 01-18866
11/13/2001AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. Volumes 1 through 4. 01-18868
12/14/2001MotionFiled Stipulation and Order. Brief due: January 14, 2002. 01-21109
12/19/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Pursuant to NRAP 9(a), appellant was required to file either a transcript request form or a certificate indicating that no transcripts are being requested by September 27, 2001. On November 13, 2001, appellant filed the opening brief and an appendix containing various transcripts. Because the transcripts required by appellant have been included in the appendix, we waive the requirement of filing a certificate indicating that no transcripts are being requested. We admonish appellant's counsel for not complying with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. In the event respondent needs additional transcripts, respondent shall comply with the provisions of NRAP 9(a)(2). 01-21417
01/15/2002MotionFiled Motion and Order/Excess Pages. Granted: 41 pages. 02-01030
01/15/2002BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: January 14, 2002. 02-01031
02/01/2002BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: 02/01/02. Signed by: Richard Cornell. 02-02157
02/01/2002Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
09/11/2002Case Status Update Resubmitted for Decision. Panel: Northern Nevada Panel. NNP03Y-RR/CY/DA
11/05/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." NNP03Y-RR/CY/DA 02-19088
11/15/2002Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Rehearing. 02-19746
12/11/2002Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NRAP 40(c). NNP03Y-CY/RR/DA 02-21139
12/16/2002Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. 02-21418
12/16/2002MotionFiled Motion for Stay. Motion for Stay of Issuance of Remittitur. 02-21484
01/09/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. On December 16, 2002, appellant filed a petition for en banc reconsideration and a motion to stay issuance of the remittitur pending resolution of the December 16, 2002, petition for en banc reconsideration. No good cause appearing, we deny the motion to stay issuance of the remittitur. The clerk of this court shall issue the remittitur. 03-00489
01/09/2003RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 03-00243
01/09/2003Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
01/23/2003MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authorties. 03-01285
01/24/2003RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on January 17, 2003. 03-00243
02/11/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. for leave to file a "Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities, in connection with is Petition for Rehearing En Banc" filed January 23, 2003. The clerk of this court shall file the document entitled "Appellant's Supplemental Authorities" received on January 23, 2003. We remind counsel for appellant that proposed documents should not be submitted to this court attached to a motion, but should be submitted under separate cover. 03-02358
02/11/2003BriefFiled Supplemental Authorities. 03-01286
03/06/2003Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. Having considered the petition on file herein, we have concluded that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. NRAP 40A. Accordingly, we "ORDER the petition DENIED." EN BANC 03-03832