judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

SADDEDDIN AWAMLEH V. UNION STATION INVESTICO, LLC

Case Information: 11-CV-0661
Short Caption:SADDEDDIN AWAMLEH V. UNION STATION INVESTICO, LLCClassification:Appeals - Civil - Landlord And Tenant
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:LTB16739-10Filed Date:05/24/2011

Opening Event Date:05/24/2011Case Status:Decided/Dismissed
Record Completed:10/21/2011Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:02/01/2012

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantSaddeddin Awamleh N
Kamal NawashNY
AppelleeUnion Station Investico, LLCN
Kevin A. KernanNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
05/24/2011NOTICE OF APPEAL
06/03/2011APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Saddeddin Awamleh's Motion to Stay . . . order to hold Saddeddin Awamleh personally liable for the judgment against America R US d/b/a Children's World
06/06/2011TMC - EMERGENCY motion to stay - oppo
06/10/2011APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE- to defendent's emergency motion to stay Judge Gardner's May 18,order to hold Saddeddin Awamleh personally liable for the the judgment against america r us d/b/a children's world AND motion for bond pursuant to ruld 7 & 8(b) of the rules of D.C.C.A.
06/16/2011ORDER DENYING APPELLANT MOTION FOR STAY as appellant has failed to establish the elements to warrant a stay. See Barry v. Washington Post Co., 529 A.2d 319, 321 (D.C. 1987). The trial court properly amended the judgment to include appellant, the sole proprietor of America R US. See Pritchett v. Stillwll, 604 A.2d 886, 889-90 (D.C. 1992); Moore v. Moore, 391 A.2d 762, 768 (D.C. 1978). It is (MORE)
06/16/2011 F/ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a).(GL,RD,TE)
07/06/2011FiledSTATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 5/18/11) (elp)
08/23/2011FiledOrder Sua Sponte directing status of transcripts within 10 calendar days from the date of the order.
09/19/2011FiledOrder Sua Sponte Dismissing Appeal
09/19/2011WithdrawnDismissed
09/29/2011FiledRecord Index
09/29/2011FiledSupplemental Record #1 (33-pgs/tape 5/18/11 proc) w/cd
09/30/2011FiledMotion To Reinstate Appeal (Appellant)Granted
10/21/2011FiledOrder Granting Motion To Reinstate Appeal and filing the lodged statement regarding transcript payment
10/21/2011FiledReceived Statement Regarding Transcript Payment (Appellant)
10/21/2011FiledRecord Completed
10/21/2011FiledBriefing Order
11/21/2011FiledMotion For Extension Of Time to File Appendix, Brief (Appellant)Granted
11/22/2011FiledMotion For Summary Affirmance (Appellee)Granted
11/23/2011FiledTMC/MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE/APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEFING//LODGED BRIEF/APPENDIX
12/21/2011LodgedBrief (Appellee) w/ supplemental appendix
01/09/2012FiledORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME and the CLERK SHALL FILE THE LODGED BRIEF AND APPENDIX and GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE
01/09/2012FiledBrief (Appellant)
01/09/2012FiledAppendix (Appellant)
01/09/2012FiledAffirmed
02/01/2012FiledMandate