| Case Information: 36517 | |||
| Short Caption: | BEALS VS. DISTRICT COURT | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 36533 , 36683 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Carson City - First Judicial District - 9900479U | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Proper Person Writ Petition |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| Party Information | ||
| Role | Party Name | Represented By |
| Petitioner | Shane Mark Beals | In Proper Person |
| Real Party in Interest | Carson City District Attorney | |
| Real Party in Interest | Coty Beals | Carson City District Attorney |
| Real Party in Interest | Destiny Beals | Carson City District Attorney |
| Real Party in Interest | Rebecca E. Walker | Carson City District Attorney |
| Real Party in Interest | State of Florida | Carson City District Attorney |
| Respondent | The First Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for Carson City | |
| Respondent | The Honorable David R. Gamble, District Judge | |
| Respondent | The Honorable Mario G. Recanzone, Senior Judge | |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 08/04/2000 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 08/04/2000 | Petition/Writ | Filed Proper Person Petition for Writ. Motion to the Honorable Supreme Court Justice C.J. Rose to Void the Honorable Mario G. Recanzone's Order and to Order the Appointment of the Eighth Judicial District Court Judge to Preside over the Hearing of the Motion to Disqualify the Honorable David R. Gamble. | 00-13528 | |
| 09/18/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Denying Petition. " . . . we deny the petition." fn2[We deny petitioner's motion for an order requiring Judge Gamble to file a more responsive answer to the motion to disqualify; the motion is moot. We also deny petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel to assist him; petitioner does not have a right to appointed counsel in the underlying paternity action.] SNP99A-CY/WM/NB | 00-16357 | |
| 10/16/2000 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 00-16476 | |
| 10/16/2000 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||